A Number Raised to the m Power

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
Raising a number to the mth power, where m is a positive even number, does not guarantee a real result for complex numbers. For instance, (1+2i)^4 results in a complex number, disproving the initial assumption. When m equals 2, the expression (a + bi)(a + bi) expands to a^2 - b^2 + 2abi, which is only real if either a or b is zero. Thus, the statement is only true for real or purely imaginary numbers when m is 2. The discussion highlights the need to analyze complex number behavior under exponentiation.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
Hello Everyone,

I was wondering, does anyone know of a proof that showed if a number is raised to the mth power, where m is a positive even number, the number is always real?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
(1+2i)4 = -7-24i
 
Drats! I was hoping it was true! How about if m were only 2? Would the statement then be true?
 
It isn't: (a + bi)(a + bi) = a^2 + 2abi + b^2i^2 = a^2 + 2abi - b^2
 
Bashyboy said:
Drats! I was hoping it was true! How about if m were only 2? Would the statement then be true?

##(1+i)^2=1+2i-1=2i##

Your claim will only be true for ##m=2## if the number is only real or imaginary. This is clear by expanding a complex number as a binomial.

##(a+bi)^2=a^2-b^2+2abi##

In order for this to be real, either ##a## or ##b## must be zero. You should check the case when ##m=4## by squaring ##(a^2-b^2+abi)## to see what you get.


Edit: I see that you figured it out as I was posting
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top