A Parent-Child Lookalike: Mother/Father and Daughter/Son

  • Thread starter Thread starter tgt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the genetic resemblance between parents and their children, specifically challenging the notion that sons resemble their mothers and daughters resemble their fathers. It argues that primary and secondary sexual characteristics show greater similarity between fathers and sons, and mothers and daughters. Additionally, there is a suggestion that daughters may resemble their aunts (father's sisters) and sons may resemble their uncles (mother's brothers). The conversation also touches on the idea that individuals may be drawn to partners who resemble their parents, although this observation is noted to vary among individuals. Overall, the thread critiques the biological accuracy of the initial claims regarding familial resemblance.
tgt
Messages
519
Reaction score
2
that for humans, the male tend (probabilistically) to look more like his mother and the daughter tend to look more like her father?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
This is not true, the primary and secondary sexual characteristics are much more similar between father and son, or mother and daughter. :smile:
 
I think daughter is look like her aunt(father's sister) & boy is look like his uncle(mather's brother).
 
I seem to recall hearing that people tended to choose people that looked like their mothers or fathers.
 
pmehnati said:
I think daughter is look like her aunt(father's sister) & boy is look like his uncle(mather's brother).

I did note this, but it doesn’t apply to all. I guess it depends
 
Last edited:
This thread doesn't meet criteria for a discussion in biology.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top