A person uses a re-flecting telescope of dia= 20 cm

  • Thread starter Thread starter burgerkin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Telescope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum angular resolution, diameter of the Airy disk, and minimum separation distance of two objects using a reflecting telescope with a 20 cm diameter and a 170 cm focal length. The initial calculation for angular resolution yielded an incorrect value due to confusion over the use of the 1.22 factor in the formula. After realizing that the telescope's equation should not include this factor, the correct answers were obtained. The calculations for the diameter of the Airy disk and the separation distance also required careful attention to unit conversions, particularly from degrees to radians. Ultimately, clarity on the correct formula led to successful resolution of the homework problems.
burgerkin
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




A person uses a re-flecting telescope of dia= 20 cm and f=170 cm to observe light of λ = 600 nm from a star.
(a) find minimum angular resolution can he get?
°

(b) find the diameter of the Airy disk?
µm

(c) find the minimum separation distance of two objects on the Mars that the telescope can resolve? (The Earth-Mars distance is 3.83 10^8 m.)


Homework Equations



\theta = 1.22 (\lambda / D




The Attempt at a Solution



for part A, I used the relation above to solve for \theta = 0.00021 degree

for part b and c, I don't know how to solve. Please help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
bump bump
 
You've calculated the angular radius of the Airy disk as θ = 0.00021 degrees (arcseconds would be a nice unit to use here), which corresponds to the angular resolving power of the telescope.

Use θ and the focal length to determine the linear diameter of the Airy disk. For small angles, the linear projection at distance r is rθ. Remember, θ corresponds to the radius, not the diameter.

For part c, determine what the linear separation of two objects has to be at the distance of Mars in order for the angular separation as observed on Earth to be equal to the angular Airy radius of the scope.
 
Thanks so much!

However, I got wrong answers for all 3 parts. I followed your instructions, so I am thinking I might have done the first one wrong.

Do I need the factor of 1.22 for the first formula? Since it says diameter, I used the equation with 1.22.

For part b, I let p(object distance goes to infinity) to get q, the image distance, so I got q=1.7 m, than r = 1.7 x \theta

then dia = 2r, but the answer is wrong

part c I used d =L \theta

wrong answer again, I guess cause my value for part a is wrong
 
Is the telescope a circular aperture? If not, I do not need 1.22 factor in that equation.
 
For part (a), the formula for the angular radius of the Airy disk is sin(θ) = 1.22λ/D as you've stated. For the given data you obtained a result of θ = 0.000021°. I might have used scientific notation here, and said θ = 2.10 x 10-4 °, or converted to arcseconds,
θ = 0.755''.

For part (b) it seems that they want the linear diameter of the Airy disk in micrometers (µm).
You've got the angular radius θ and the focal length d = 170cm. As you stated, the diameter should be 2*θ*d using the small angle approximation. Did you remember to convert your angle to radians? can you show your calculation and result?
 
For part a, I was asked to give the answer in degree, so I did not convert to radians. So the calculation did give me 0.00021 degree, but it was wrong answer.

For part b, I did 2 x 1.7 x 0.00021 =7.14 e-4, and I did convert into micro meter, 714 \mum And again, it was wrong..
 
I just realized that I did not use radians for part b.

Anyhow, 0.00021 degree is a wrong answer. But the question is asking angle in degrees.
 
Last edited:
Hi Thanks a lot!

I just found out that for telescope, we use the equation without 1.22 factor. And I tried. answers are all correct.
 
  • #10
burgerkin said:
Hi Thanks a lot!

I just found out that for telescope, we use the equation without 1.22 factor. And I tried. answers are all correct.

Hmm. That's a pretty common approximation I suppose; The "true" formula should include the 1.22 constant. I'm a bit surprised that the system accepts a "crude" approximation and rejects the more accurate result. Ah well, I'm glad that you succeeded.
 
Back
Top