A Problem in " Electric Potential "

AI Thread Summary
The electric potential is zero at a point 4 cm from the 4 µC charge, but there are additional locations along the line between the two charges where this occurs. The discussion emphasizes that the initial answer may not account for all possible points where the electric potential could be zero. It is clarified that the analysis should focus solely on the line connecting the two charges, without considering other dimensions. The participants suggest that there are two distinct locations on this line where the electric potential is indeed zero. Understanding the complete scenario is crucial for accurately determining all points of zero electric potential.
Ana Mido
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Please I want to check my answers of this problem:-
Two charges 4 µc , -6 µc are placed on the x-axis 10 cm apart. where is the electric potential be zero ?

My Answer is:-
"4 cm apart from the charge of 4 µc"
Is that right ?!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me!
 
Ana Mido said:
Please I want to check my answers of this problem:-
Two charges 4 µc , -6 µc are placed on the x-axis 10 cm apart. where is the electric potential be zero ?

My Answer is:-
"4 cm apart from the charge of 4 µc"
Is that right ?!
Hello Ana Mido. Welcome to PF !


Certainly, the point at which the Electric Potential is zero is 4 cm away from the charge of 4 µC , but there may be other points 4 cm away from the charge of 4 µC where the Electric Potential is not zero.

Are you only considering the line on which the two charges lie? ... or some plane in which they lie? ... or three dimensional space?

There may also be some other point (or points) where the Electric Potential is zero .
 
SammyS said:
Hello Ana Mido. Welcome to PF !Certainly, the point at which the Electric Potential is zero is 4 cm away from the charge of 4 µC , but there may be other points 4 cm away from the charge of 4 µC where the Electric Potential is not zero.

Are you only considering the line on which the two charges lie? ... or some plane in which they lie? ... or three dimensional space?

There may also be some other point (or points) where the Electric Potential is zero .

I've considered the line on which the two charges lie. No plane . No three dimensional space.
But let's consider the line on which the two charges lie. Will the answer be right ? !
 
Ana Mido said:
I've considered the line on which the two charges lie. No plane . No three dimensional space.
But let's consider the line on which the two charges lie. Will the answer be right ? !
I'm rather sure that there should be one other location.

By The Way: You haven't actually removed all ambiguity regarding your answer of 4 cm away from the charge of 4 µC. There are two such locations on the line on which both charges lie.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top