A question about convergence with probability one

ziyanlan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have two sequences of r.v.s Xn and Yn. Xn converges to X with probability 1, and Yn converges to Y with probability 1. Does (Xn, Yn) converges to (X, Y) with probability 1? Is there a reference to confirm or negate this?

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ziyanlan said:
Suppose I have two sequences of r.v.s Xn and Yn. Xn converges to X with probability 1, and Yn converges to Y with probability 1. Does (Xn, Yn) converges to (X, Y) with probability 1? Is there a reference to confirm or negate this?

Thanks a lot.

I don't know what context this is in, but my answer would be that (Xn,Yn) converges to (X,Y) is equivalent to the statement that Xn converges to X and Yn converges to Y (with respect to any topology). Hence, if we treat these events as A and B respectively, you know P(A) = 1, P(B) = 1, hence P(A \cap B) = P(A)+P(B) -P(A \cup B) =1.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top