A question about heat transfer

AI Thread Summary
In thermal contact, two objects at the same temperature can have different internal energies without heat flow occurring, as confirmed in the discussion. When one object is hotter than the other, heat flows from the hotter to the cooler object, leading to an increase in the internal energy of the cooler object, while the hotter object's internal energy decreases. This decrease in internal energy of the hotter object is not solely from its kinetic energy; it can also include contributions from other forms of energy, such as strain energy. The conversation highlights that heat transfer involves complex interactions, including potential energy changes, and emphasizes that the microscopic mechanisms of energy transfer are still an area of ongoing research. Understanding these processes goes beyond basic thermodynamics, which typically focuses on macroscopic outcomes rather than intermediate states.
frensel
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi. If there are two objects A and B, the temperature of A is TA, the temperature of B is TB, and my questions are:

1). If TA = TB, their internal energy (which is the kinetic energy plus some other forms of energy) might not be the same. In this case, A and B are in thermal contact. Since TA = TB, no heat flow happens. Am I correct? The internal energies of A and B remain the same although the internal energy of A may be larger than the internal energy of B.

2). If TA > TB, heat flow is from A to B. Here, I know that the internal energy of B will increase (TB might not be increased though in the case of phase transition). However, how about the change of the internal energy of A? Is that all the heat flow from A is from the kinetic energy of A's molecules? or some of the heat flow come from the kinetic energy of A and some of it come from the other forms of energy of A such as the potential energy?

thx.
 
Science news on Phys.org
1) Is completely correct.

2) Has merits and is nearly there but internal energy can also appear as strain energy as well as kinetic energy of the molecules. So if we take two strips of differing metals and fix them rigidly together and then heat one strip. We will find that the heat will be transferred from one to the other until their temperatures equalise. However the resulting compound strip will have bent due to the differing coefficients of expansion of the metals. The resulting bent strip will have a higher stain energy than the unbent strip.
This strain energy can only have come from the supplied heat.

Note for the above strip

Q = \Delta U + W

W = zero since no work is done on or by the strip on the external environment.
 
Studiot said:
1) Is completely correct.

2) Has merits and is nearly there but internal energy can also appear as strain energy as well as kinetic energy of the molecules. So if we take two strips of differing metals and fix them rigidly together and then heat one strip. We will find that the heat will be transferred from one to the other until their temperatures equalise. However the resulting compound strip will have bent due to the differing coefficients of expansion of the metals. The resulting bent strip will have a higher stain energy than the unbent strip.
This strain energy can only have come from the supplied heat.

Note for the above strip

Q = \Delta U + W

W = zero since no work is done on or by the strip on the external environment.

Thank you for your reply. I still have a question for you second point. If you heat strip A, A absorbs heat and some of the energy turn into the kinetic energy of A and some of it turn into the strain energy of A. Since strip A and strip B are in temperature difference now, heat flow from A to B is started. It is clear that the heat flow B absorbed turns into both the kinetic and strain energy of B since B also bent, but how about the energy lost of A? Is that all the energy A transferred to B originated from the kinetic energy of A? If this is not true, what is the microscopic mechanism of transfer the non kinetic energy as heat to other objects?
 
Elementary thermodynamics does not tell us about the intermediate states only the end result. Intermediate states not normally definable and the subject of modern research.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top