A question about Joule's experiment

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Misr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around James Joule's experiment involving movable and fixed paddles in a calorimeter, specifically addressing the purpose of preventing water circulation during the experiment. Participants explore the implications of water movement on energy transfer and temperature changes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that preventing water circulation was to ensure that the energy input would not be used for moving the water, but rather for heating it.
  • Others argue that if the water rotated uniformly, it would not induce sufficient molecular collisions to raise the temperature, implying that random motion is necessary for effective heating.
  • A participant notes that Joule's experiment was a series of tests, with the paddle wheel being one method used to measure the mechanical equivalent of heat.
  • There is a correction regarding the apparatus details, clarifying that there was only one set of paddles and fixed vanes, which may have been confused with other components.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the details of the experiment and seek further clarification on the mechanics involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanics of Joule's experiment and the role of water movement. There is no consensus on the precise reasons for preventing circulation or the implications of water motion on temperature changes.

Contextual Notes

Some participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of the experiment's details and the potential for confusion regarding the apparatus configuration.

Misr
Messages
384
Reaction score
0
In the famous experiment of James Joule,
he used eight movable paddles and four fixed ones to prevent water circulation
so why did he want to prevent water circulation?
Thank you
 
Science news on Phys.org
I'm unaware of that level of detail regarding his apparatus, but if true, a likely reason is that he did not want the water to have any energy available to do work, which would be the case if the water within the tank was rotating uniformly. There would, for example, be a transfer of energy from the rotating water back onto the (moving) paddles.
 
I'm unaware of that level of detail regarding his apparatus, but if true, a likely reason is that he did not want the water to have any energy available to do work, which would be the case if the water within the tank was rotating uniformly. There would, for example, be a transfer of energy from the rotating water back onto the (moving) paddles.
I don't really understand this .
but i think if the water rotated uniformly - without using the fixed vanes- the molecules of water wouldn't rub together , consequently no rise in temperature would occur

i don't know whether this is true or not but do u have better explanation?
 
Let me back up- what was the result of Joule's experiment, and how is this conclusion supported by the data?
 
Joules experiments to determine the mechanical equivalent of heat were actually a series of experiments, the paddle wheel being just one.

Essentially a known amount of energy was put into a known quantity of water and the resultant temperature rise measured.

Since the input agitated the water paddles were used to still the water so all the energy input ended up as heat, not motion.

In one case paddles were also used to agitate the water. These were driven by a falling weight, so defining the mechanical work.

There were four experiments in all with the following resulting numbers of foot-pounds of work required to raise 1 pound of water one degree Farenheit.

Paddles (fluid turbulence) 773
Compressed Gas (PV work) 795
Rubbing two iron blocks (Friction) 775
Electric current (resistive heating) 838

This lead to his conculsion that the mechanical equivalent of heat was 4.16 Joules/calorie. (CF today's value 4.184)
 
I never did the Joule paddle experiment but I do remember doing the Callender and Barnes experiment with water flowing over an electrical element. I was 'well chuffed' (as you can be at 17) by the idea of making sure the hot outlet temperature and cold inlet temperature were kept symmetrical about room temperature to eliminate / reduce the effects of spurious heat loss.
I can't remember what answer we got but I can guarantee that we would have calculated it to an inappropriately large number of sig figs.
 
but this is not the answer to my question
 
Without the paddles most of the energy would go into moving the water rather then heating the water. To heat the water you need to induce lots of collisions between water molecules so each molecule needs to have a motion which is not the same as its neighbors. If they all have the same velocity as in nice uniformly stirred water which moves with the exact same velocity of the moving paddles then you will not see much change in temperature. The idea is to put the paddles energy into RANDOM motion of the water, not uniform motion. The stationary paddles do not allow the water to move uniformly around the container.
 
Actually, Misr I bothered to look up the original experiment and read it properly.

I believed you had done so when you reported there were two sets of paddles, but there was only one set.

You may have been confusing vanes which were fixed to the inside of the casing to assist mixing and friction. There was a narrow gap between the fixed vanes and the moveable paddles. They were more like tubine blades or a kitchen blender than paddle steamer wheels.

The paddle consists of eight sets of four arms spaced equally round the axle and rotating in between four sets of vanes, each having five arms, fixed to the wall of the calorimeter
 
Last edited:
  • #10
"but this is not the answer to my question "

The answer/s is /are clear, I think. If the water is still moving then that proportion of the input Energy is not yet transferred to Heat - it's still coherent KE.
The longer the experiment takes, the more heat will 'get out' into the surroundings and add inaccuracy, so get the transfer to happen as fast as poss. Also, I suppose that you need good mixing so that the measured temperature really does represent the temperature of all the water.
 
  • #11
Without the paddles most of the energy would go into moving the water rather then heating the water. To heat the water you need to induce lots of collisions between water molecules so each molecule needs to have a motion which is not the same as its neighbors. If they all have the same velocity as in nice uniformly stirred water which moves with the exact same velocity of the moving paddles then you will not see much change in temperature. The idea is to put the paddles energy into RANDOM motion of the water, not uniform motion. The stationary paddles do not allow the water to move uniformly around the container.
That's it!
Thanks for all of you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
15K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K