A question about potential energy and work

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concepts of potential energy, work, and kinetic energy in the context of a mass being dropped and then lifted. When a mass is released from a height, the work done by gravity results in a change in kinetic energy, calculated as Mgh. Conversely, when lifting the mass without acceleration, the work done by the lifter equals the gravitational force, but there is no change in kinetic energy since the initial and final velocities are the same. The conversation highlights that while work is done, it does not always correlate directly with a change in kinetic energy, emphasizing the distinction between work and net work. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the conservation of energy in mechanical systems.
n3pix
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I'm confusing about the basic terms about Conservation of Energy, Potential Energy and Work.

Consider that we have a mass ##M## above the ground (zero point) distance of ##y_{0}=h##. When we release the mass it will accelerate through it's way to ground. So the work is made by a field force (gravitation) that is ##F_{G}=-Mg##. The last position of the mass is ##y=0##. So the displacement of mass is equal to ##(y-y_{0})=(0-h)=-h##. Therefore, the work done by gravity is ##W(by gravity)=F_{G}\times(y-y_{0})=(-Mg)(-h)=Mgh##. As the definition of work (as I learnt), the work done by something is equal to the force times displacement of the body and It's equal to change in kinetic energy of that body. So, if we consider that the mass has initial velocity ##V_{0}=0## and last velocity at the moment it touch the ground ##V##. Therefore, work done by gravity is equal to ##W(by gravity)=Mgh=\Delta{KE}=\frac{1}{2}M{{V}^{2}}-\frac{1}{2}M{{V_{0}}^{2}}=\frac{1}{2}M{V^{2}}-\frac{1}{2}M\times{0}=\frac{1}{2}M{V^{2}}##.

I hope there is no problem about my ubderstanding about this example (falling body example).

I will now give you reverse example, mass M raised by us. To raise mass M from the ground or heigh of ##y_{0}=0## to height of ##y=h## without acceleration we must apply an upward, equal and opposite force ##F_{ag}=-F_{G}=Mg##. So the work done by us is ##W(by us)=F_{ag}(y-y_{0})=(Mg)(h-0)=Mgh##. As the definition of work, there must be change in kinetic energy of the object. The initial velocity and last velocity of the object are same and the mass has no acceleration. Therefore, ##W(by us)=Mgh=\Delta{KE}=\frac{1}{2}M{{V}^{2}}-\frac{1}{2}M{{V}^{2}}=0##.

What does this mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
n3pix said:
As the definition of work, there must be change in kinetic energy of the object.
Realize that when you lift the object, gravity is still doing work (negative work). So the net work is zero, thus no change in KE.
 
  • Like
Likes n3pix and PeroK
Doc Al said:
Realize that when you lift the object, gravity is still doing work (negative work). So the net work is zero, thus no change in KE.

Wow, I didn't think this way. Thank you so much :)
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
n3pix said:
As the definition of work, there must be change in kinetic energy of the object.
In the context of this thread, that statement is 'ok' but there is no inherent relationship between Work and change of KE. The work will change the total of Potential and Kinetic Energy. The longer the time taken, the less KE change will result.
Practical note: To obtain exactly zero KE change, the profile of the force over a journey of finite time would not be uniform. (e.g. you need to slow up near the top and reduce the applied force in an elevator)
 
  • Like
Likes n3pix
sophiecentaur said:
In the context of this thread, that statement is 'ok' but there is no inherent relationship between Work and change of KE. The work will change the total of Potential and Kinetic Energy. The longer the time taken, the less KE change will result.
Practical note: To obtain exactly zero KE change, the profile of the force over a journey of finite time would not be uniform. (e.g. you need to slow up near the top and reduce the applied force in an elevator)

Thanks, I think I get the idea but I will try to ask my questions about this topic here.
 
n3pix said:
As the definition of work, there must be change in kinetic energy of the object.
This ("must") is incorrect.

Edit: There is a difference between work and net work, this is what @Doc Al is reminding us to keep straight.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and n3pix
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top