I understand quantum tunnelling while thought as the one happening in fusion.But could someone explain the process when we're talking about a particle passing through a physical barrier not just a potential barrier?
thanks
ALL barriers are potential barriers. The repulsion of a proton against a nucleus for fusion is just like the repulsion of an atom against other atoms as it tries to get through whatever barrier.
Yes I understand that but there is difference between these two situations.
In fusion a proton goes into the high potential area of the electric field and continues motion till it collides with the other proton and its finished.
But in second situation the atom not only must go into the high potential area but also must pass the atoms themselves.How can matter pass through matter?
that's what I mean.(nice signature drak)
thanks
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
I don't know why the electrons in atoms are considered in the orbitals while they could be in sates which are superpositions of these orbitals? If electrons are in the superposition of these orbitals their energy expectation value is also constant, and the atom seems to be stable!