A question about residual stress

  • Thread starter Thread starter kelvin490
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stress
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of residual stress induced by shot peening in metal parts, exploring the mechanisms behind the existence of compressive stress after the inducing force is removed. Participants examine the relationship between plastic deformation, residual stress, and the balance of tensile stress within the material.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that shot peening induces residual compressive stress on the surface layer of metal parts due to plastic deformation caused by particle impacts.
  • Others argue that the impacts lead to a permanent change in shape, similar to the effects seen when working with ductile metals.
  • A participant mentions that there is a residual tensile stress inside the component that balances the compressive stress in the surface layer.
  • Questions arise regarding whether plastic deformation necessarily implies the presence of residual stress, with some suggesting it usually does but not always.
  • One participant illustrates a scenario involving a sphere covered by a thin layer, explaining how plastic deformation can occur without residual stress if the layer is not attached to the sphere.
  • Another participant discusses how, in a solid sphere, the attachment of the surface to the interior leads to elastic stretching of the inner material, resulting in uniform tensile stress throughout.
  • Concerns are raised about how tensile stress becomes uniform in real cases, given that each collision causes localized compression and tension.
  • It is suggested that work hardening occurs in the depressions created by impacts, leading to an equilibrium point where the surface becomes too hard for further plastic deformation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the relationship between plastic deformation and residual stress, with no consensus reached on the mechanisms of stress uniformity or the necessity of residual stress in all cases of plastic deformation.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the attachment of surface layers to inner materials and the effects of work hardening, which may not be universally applicable to all materials or scenarios.

kelvin490
Gold Member
Messages
227
Reaction score
3
Shot peening is a process of inducing RESIDUAL COMPRESSIVE STRESS on the surface layer of metal parts. When shooting particles are colliding on the surface of metal there is a compressive stress. My question is, how can resultant compressive stress exists after the force causing the compression is removed (i.e. after the shooting particle leaves the surface)?

Normally we need a force to hold the object in compressive state. For residual stress, are there any parts in tension to balance this stress?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
kelvin490 said:
My question is, how can resultant compressive stress exists after the force causing the compression is removed (i.e. after the shooting particle leaves the surface)?
The impacts cause plastic deformation of the surface. If you could somehow remove the surface layer from the rest of the component, it would have permanently changed its shape, the same way as beating out a sheet of ductile metal like gold or silver makes it thinner and covers a bigger area.

Normally we need a force to hold the object in compressive state. For residual stress, are there any parts in tension to balance this stress?

There is a residual tensile stress inside the component that balances the compressive stress in the surface layer.
 
Tempered glass is manufactured in a way such that the outer surface remains in compression. By staying in compression, the growth of cracks in the glass is inhibited if the glass should be struck by an object, preventing it from shattering.
 
AlephZero said:
The impacts cause plastic deformation of the surface. If you could somehow remove the surface layer from the rest of the component, it would have permanently changed its shape, the same way as beating out a sheet of ductile metal like gold or silver makes it thinner and covers a bigger area.

There is a residual tensile stress inside the component that balances the compressive stress in the surface layer.

The surface is plastically deformed, but does plastic deformation necessarily implies the presence of residual stress?

How can a tensile stress built up inside the metal? It is hard to visualize.
 
kelvin490 said:
The surface is plastically deformed, but does plastic deformation necessarily implies the presence of residual stress?

Not necessarily, but it usually does create some residual stress if only part of the object is plastically deformed.

How can a tensile stress built up inside the metal? It is hard to visualize.

Suppose you have a sphere covered with a thin layer of material that fits exactly around the sphere but is not attached to it.

If you then shot peened the sphere, you would permanently deform the surface layer (plastically) so it became slightly thinner. Because plastic deformation does not change the volume of the material, the the thinner layer must have a slightly larger radius to keep the volume the same. In other words it would now be a loose fit around the inside solid sphere. (If you ever tried panel beating to remove dents from a metal plate, you will soon discover that effect - the beaten-out part of the plate always ends up "too big" for the area it has to cover.)

In that situation, there is no residual stress anywhere. The shot peening creates permanent plastic strain that changes the shape of the surface layer, but no stress, because a gap could open up between the surface layer and the inside.

But in the real life solid sphere, the surface and the inside of the sphere are attached to each other. That means the inside part of the sphere has to stretch elastically to a bigger diameter, causing a tensile stress through the whole of the inside. The surface layer has to be compressed slightly, giving it a compressive stress.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
AlephZero said:
...But in the real life solid sphere, the surface and the inside of the sphere are attached to each other. That means the inside part of the sphere has to stretch elastically to a bigger diameter, causing a tensile stress through the whole of the inside. The surface layer has to be compressed slightly, giving it a compressive stress.

How does the tensile stress made uniform in real case? For each collision the particle causes compression for the inner region at the point being collided, at the same time cause tension for the inner region around the point being collide. How can this finally be uniform?
 
kelvin490 said:
How does the tensile stress made uniform in real case? For each collision the particle causes compression for the inner region at the point being collided, at the same time cause tension for the inner region around the point being collide. How can this finally be uniform?

The depressions are made harder and stronger via work hardening. There will be an equilibrium point where the surface becomes flat (again) as the surface has become too hard for additional collisions to cause further plastic deformation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K