A question about "semantics" ["Rational Mechanics"]

  • Thread starter Thread starter GiuseppeR7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
Rational Mechanics is often considered synonymous with Analytical Mechanics, although it specifically refers to an axiomatic approach to formulating mechanics and thermodynamics. This concept gained prominence between the 1950s and 1970s through the works of researchers like Coleman, Noll, and Truesdell. For those interested in studying this field, a recommended resource is Truesdell's work in "Principles of Classical Mechanics and Field Theory." Additionally, the journal dedicated to this topic provides further insights and research. Understanding the distinction and historical context can enhance the study of mechanics.
GiuseppeR7
Messages
61
Reaction score
2
Hi guys...i was wondering what is "Rational Mechanics"? and is it the same as "Analytical Mechanics"? Which book do you guys suggest for studying this stuff?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GiuseppeR7 said:
i was wondering what is "Rational Mechanics"? and is it the same as "Analytical Mechanics"?

I' don't remember seeing the term "Rational Mechanics" before, in more than forty years of studying and teaching physics. After Googling a bit, I think it's just another term that some people like to use instead of "Analytical Mechanics."
 
GiuseppeR7 said:
Hi guys...i was wondering what is "Rational Mechanics"? and is it the same as "Analytical Mechanics"? Which book do you guys suggest for studying this stuff?

"Rational Mechanics" and "Rational Thermodynamics" generally refers to a program of study that seeks to provide an axiomatic method of formulating mechanics (and thermodynamics). The work originated in the 1950's through 1970's, principally by Coleman, Noll, and Truesdell, for a good overview see:

Truesdell, C.; https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Toupin&action=edit&redlink=1 (1960). "The Classical Field Theories". In Flügge, Siegfried. Principles of Classical Mechanics and Field Theory/Prinzipien der Klassischen Mechanik und Feldtheorie. Handbuch der Physik (Encyclopedia of Physics). III/1. Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 226–793. Zbl 0118.39702.

And the journal: http://link.springer.com/journal/205
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top