A question in Permutations and combinations

Vishalrox
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
there are 4 circles and 4 straight lines...find the maximum number of intersecting points possible in the intersection of all these given figures...i can't get how to solve it...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you mean the maximum number of points where they all intersect? Or just at least 2 intersect?
 
A circle can intersect another circle only twice so you would have:
6 intersects + 4 intersects + 2 intersects= 12

A straight line can intersect a circle a maximum of twice and there are four circles so:
8 intersects per line x 4 lines = 32 intersects.

Each line can also intersect the other lines at a single point so they overlap each of the four lines so not recounting an intersect would be:
3+2+1=6

Add them up:
12+32+6= 50 max intersects

Someone should check this ;)
 
mesa said:
A circle can intersect another circle only twice so you would have:
6 intersects + 4 intersects + 2 intersects= 12

A straight line can intersect a circle a maximum of twice and there are four circles so:
8 intersects per line x 4 lines = 32 intersects.

Each line can also intersect the other lines at a single point so they overlap each of the four lines so not recounting an intersect would be:
3+2+1=6

Add them up:
12+32+6= 50 max intersects
That's certainly an upper bound, but it's not immediately obvious that all these intersections are achievable simultaneously.
Start with some circle C. (This is not one of THE circles, it's just used for construction.)
You can arrange N equal circles, larger than C, such that each surrounds C. Clearly each pair of these intersects.
Any M straight lines in general position must intersect each other.
The region in which the intersections of the lines occurs can be bounded by a circle, D. Shrink that picture as necessary and fit D inside C. Necessarily, every line intersects every circle.
So any number of circles and lines can be arranged to achieve the upper bound.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top