A ranking of college majors by IQ score

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the validity and implications of IQ testing, with participants expressing skepticism about the usefulness of IQ scores and their correlation with academic performance. A study referenced indicates that IQ scores vary by college major, but some argue that IQ tests primarily measure test-taking ability rather than true intelligence. Concerns are raised about cultural bias in IQ testing and how socioeconomic factors can influence scores, suggesting that educational background may not accurately reflect innate intelligence. The conversation also touches on the relationship between SAT scores and IQ, with some asserting that while IQ can predict academic performance, it is not the sole determinant of success in fields like science. Additionally, there are humorous exchanges about the dynamics of arguments in marriage, illustrating a light-hearted diversion from the main topic. Overall, the thread critiques the concept of IQ as a definitive measure of intelligence and highlights the complexities surrounding educational assessments.
kikko
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I saw a similar study by Yale psychologists, the results were roughly the same (they were mostly 1 or 2 points higher in most categories).

http://www.statisticbrain.com/iq-estimates-by-intended-college-major/

Legally "mentally handicapped" person's IQ < 70
Average IQ = 100 by definition


I don't like the concept of IQ's, and think they are just something for pretentious folk to throw around to justify they are more intelligent than the average population. The idea of MENSA is a bit sickening to me, but I thought someone else might like to see the results.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, Mensa is a joke for stuck-up [jerks]. I know 3 people who brag about belonging to it, and they're all stupid compared to the mechanics, drywallers, and farmers that I hang out with.
None of those scores in your link are close to the one that I got, and I was drunk out of my mind when I took the test. (Of course, I'm on my 14th beer of the day right now and feel sober, so that's just a matter of my own opinion.) I also never finished high-school.
As Evo pointed out years ago, the only thing that IQ tests measure is one's ability to take IQ tests.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Philosophy beat math...micromass isn't going to like this =p
 
WannabeNewton said:
Philosophy beat math...micromass isn't going to like this =p

*Points ban gun at wbn*
 
micromass said:
*points ban gun at wbn*

get at me bro
 
What's "Mathematical Sciences"?
 
Danger said:
As Evo pointed out years ago, the only thing that IQ tests measure is one's ability to take IQ tests.

I'm not sure how the two things have been measured here, but there appears to be an almost perfect correlation between the SAT score and the IQ score. So, if IQ can be used to very accurately predict your SAT score, then it can most certainly be used to accurately predict other similar challenges you might encounter also, for example, how well you would perform at working with your mind, like in science. I agree that it may not be the only important thing for doing e.g. science but IQ should certainly be one important part of it, and so not a useless metric.
 
WannabeNewton said:
Philosophy beat math...
That's got to be a misprint. It's surely 29, not 129.
 
Zarqon said:
there appears to be an almost perfect correlation between the SAT score and the IQ score... ...IQ should certainly be one important part of it, and so not a useless metric.

The problem is that SAT scores reflect education, not intelligence. And unless things have changed drastically in the past couple of decades, almost all IQ tests are guilty of that as well as being culturally biased. For instance, Japanese children consistently scored higher on the same test than North American ones because of their learning ethic and pattern-recognition abilities heightened by the artistic nature of their culture. Something as simple as economics can affect it as well. A kid from someplace like inner-city New York who can't afford proper nutrition and books could end up scoring lower than someone a lot dumber who is rich enough to go to a fancy school and eat properly.
 
  • #10
Maybe this was supposed to be obvious or assumed, but it says majors, not graduates. Which to me implies current students, even at the 1st year level. Is that true, or was this a sample of graduates?

A lot of naive people bite off more than they can chew, only to drop out or switch majors later on. I usually saw people switching from engineering/science to business/education/humanities after 1-2 years, not the other way around. So, if they are sampling graduates or last year majors or all majors, the results will each be different I'd guess. I am suspicious that so many subjects have very close IQ values even though they vary greatly in difficulty, so I don't think that the implied generalization that "X majors are smarter" can be made.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
So the moral of the story is that Physics majors are the smartest people in the world, thanks for clarifying what we already knew! :wink:
 
  • #12
Hmm, my wife has Master's degrees both in Physics and in Materials Engineering (1 and 4 in the table). No wonder I lose all the arguments. :rolleyes:
 
  • #13
George Jones said:
Hmm, my wife has Master's degrees both in Physics and in Materials Engineering (1 and 4 in the table). No wonder I lose all the arguments. :rolleyes:

lol, you actually think a man can win an argument with his wife?
 
  • #14
ThinkToday said:
lol, you actually think a man can win an argument with his wife?

I can say from experience that no matter how incredibly brainless that wife might be, the answer is "no".

Obviously not applicable to Mrs. Jones.
 
  • #15
ThinkToday said:
lol, you actually think a man can win an argument with his wife?

Please! This is a no-brainer. I know how to win every single argument with your wife.

Just admit that you're wrong! Leaves 'em speachless every time. Here is what you say. "Yes dear. You're right. I'm wrong. I'm slime."
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Ivan Seeking said:
Just admit that you're wrong! Leaves 'em speachless every time. Here is what you say. "Yes dear. You're right. I'm wrong. I'm slime."

Thats okay for you, because your wife is worth keeping. I'm more than happy to be rid of mine.
 
  • #17
Danger said:
Thats okay for you, because your wife is worth keeping. I'm more than happy to be rid of mine.

Don't matter. It is still the best answer for all situations.

ARE you actually wrong? Don't matter. You lose if you win and you lose if you lose, so the only way to win is to concede. It is all perfectly logical. :biggrin:
 
  • #18
Ivan Seeking said:
the only way to win is to concede. It is all perfectly logical. :biggrin:

Only if you want to keep her.
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
71
Views
26K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Back
Top