A silly question about unit tangent and unit normal

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter athrun200
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal Tangent Unit
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
I know how to obtain the unit tangent, it is very easy. But for the case of unit normal, I am confused.

Usually we need to know [itex]\vec{T'}(t)[/itex] and |[itex]\vec{T'}(t)[/itex]|
in order the find [itex]\vec{N}(t)[/itex].

However are there any quicker method to do it? Since I saw the textbook do it without step, it seems there is a quicker method.
 

Attachments

  • 3.JPG
    3.JPG
    20.2 KB · Views: 495
Physics news on Phys.org
SteamKing said:
What's the dot product of T and N?
0

But it is not enough.
Since [itex]\vec{N}[/itex]=a[itex]\hat{i}[/itex]+b[itex]\hat{j}[/itex]
There are 2 unknows, a and b.

Dot product yields only one equation, this is not enough to get [itex]\vec{N}[/itex]
 
You said N was a unit normal. The length of N gives you another equation for a and b.

The "easy" way to get the answer is to draw a picture of the tangent vector, and rotate it through 90 degrees to get the normal vector. It should then be clear than if the tangent vector is (a, b), the normal vector must be (-b, a).
 
AlephZero said:
You said N was a unit normal. The length of N gives you another equation for a and b.

The "easy" way to get the answer is to draw a picture of the tangent vector, and rotate it through 90 degrees to get the normal vector. It should then be clear than if the tangent vector is (a, b), the normal vector must be (-b, a).

Oh! Thanks a lot!