Understanding the Relationship between Velocity and Time in Calculus

  • Thread starter Thread starter sniffer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between velocity and time in calculus, specifically through the equation dv/dt = ∂v/∂r + ∂v/∂t. A participant suggests using the chain rule to clarify the relationship, leading to the equation dv/dt = ∂v/∂r * dr/dt + ∂v/∂t. This adjustment helps illustrate how changes in position (dr/dt) affect velocity. The original poster seeks clarification on whether dr/dt indicates a small velocity. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of the chain rule in understanding the dynamics of velocity as a function of position and time.
sniffer
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
i just want simple explanation of this.
velocity v is a function of r and t.
then my professor, in order to derive relationship of something, he wrote:
\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{\partial v}{\partial r}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial t}
then assuming small spatial variation,
\frac{dv}{dt} \approx \frac{\partial v}{\partial t}
my question: is the first equation above OK?
is it standard calculus? i am weak in this. please help.


thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
look up the chain rule; when v = v(r(t),t),


\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{\partial v}{\partial r}\frac{dr}{dt}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial t}

then you can see the following argument makes more sense?
 
thanks. i just want to clarify again, does it mean dr/dt is small, i.e. small velocity?
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top