A simple equality of Generalized Lorentz Operators

tamiry
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

we have Lorentz operators
J^{\mu\nu} = i(x^{\mu}\partial^{\nu} - x^{\nu}\partial^{\mu})

and these have
[J^{\mu\nu}, J^{\rho\sigma}] = i(\eta^{\nu\rho}J^{\mu\sigma} + \eta^{\mu\sigma}J^{\nu\rho} - \eta^{\mu\rho}J^{\nu\sigma} - \eta^{\nu\sigma}J^{\mu\rho})

Now define generalized rotation operators, for i, j, k space coordinates
M^{i} = \epsilon_{ijk}J^{jk}

Show that M^{i} have the SU(2) algebra. i.e.
[M^{i}, M^{j}] = i\epsilon_{ijk}M^{k}

Homework Equations


(all is above)

The Attempt at a Solution


I've done a few attempts and failed. so I tried taking an example
M^{1}= \epsilon_{123}J^{23}+\epsilon_{132}J^{32} = J^{23} - J^{32}
M^{2}= \dots = J^{31} - J^{13}

and now
[M^{1},M^{2}] = [J^{23}, J^{31}] - [J^{32}, J^{31}] + [J^{23}, J^{13}] - [J^{32}, J^{13}]

well J^{ij} = -J^{ji} so the second term negates the first one (J^{32} for J^{23}) and like wise the fourth and third term. So all in all I get zero. and that's no SU(2) :(

where did I go wrong?

thanks a lot for reading this
Tamir
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, tamiry.

tamiry said:
Now define generalized rotation operators, for i, j, k space coordinates
M^{i} = \epsilon_{ijk}J^{jk}

Did you leave out a factor of 1/2 here?

[M^{1},M^{2}] = [J^{23}, J^{31}] - [J^{32}, J^{31}] + [J^{23}, J^{13}] - [J^{32}, J^{13}]

J^{ij} = -J^{ji} so the second term negates the first one (J^{32} for J^{23}) and like wise the fourth and third term. So all in all I get zero.

Those terms don't cancel. Watch the signs carefully.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
but of course...
thanks!
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top