A simple hands on hypotesis / thought experiment / question /

AI Thread Summary
Electricity involves energy transfer at the speed of light, while the actual movement of electrons is much slower. The analogy of using a stick to push a light switch illustrates that the action is instantaneous despite the slow movement of the stick's end. A question arises about whether the movement in the stick propagates at the speed of light; however, the forces between atoms in the stick propagate at the speed of sound in the material, not light. This distinction highlights the difference between electromagnetic forces and mechanical motion in solids. Understanding these principles clarifies the nature of energy transfer and atomic interactions.
rytmenpinne
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A simple hands on hypotesis / thought experiment / question / :)

Hi, first I'd like to say that I've been trying to understand the way electricity works for some time now and thanks to the really great articles of William J Beaty, I really think I'm starting to grasp this stuff now..

Now, so I've understood that while the transfer of energy happens at the speed of light, the actaul electrons doesn't move very fast at all, it's sort of like using a stick to poke a light switch at the other side of the room. The part of the stick that's in your hands doesn't move very fast or far, but the action is instantaneous. And then a though accured to me, does the movement in the stick, even tho it's solid, also propagate at the speed of light? eg;

when you push the leftmost end, there will be a delay before the smily gets poked in the eye

push_____________________________________________________________:)

In my mind this should be the case, since if nothing can exeed the speed of light, neither should the forces that holds the atoms and matter together.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Absolutely!

The forces between atoms in the stick are primarily electromagnetic; no different (in nature) to those between electrons in a conductor.
 


The force would be propagated at the speed of sound in the stick.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top