A single molecule diffusion in ideal gas

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Galedon
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the diffusion of a single molecule in an ideal gas, focusing on the movement of an atom, its collisions, and the resulting velocity distributions. Participants explore theoretical aspects, including the implications of the Maxwell distribution and the modeling of collisions in a hard-sphere framework.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the movement of a single atom in an ideal gas consists of straight lines between collisions, leading to a spherical Gaussian distribution of its position after N collisions, questioning the variance in terms of thermodynamic parameters.
  • Another participant argues that the new random velocity after a collision is not directly derived from the Maxwell distribution, indicating that prior velocity may introduce bias into the resulting velocity distribution.
  • There is a discussion about whether the atoms are distinguishable or indistinguishable, referencing "self diffusion" in a specific literature source.
  • One participant proposes marking an atom to make it distinguishable and seeks further clarification on the referenced article from 1949.
  • The hard-sphere model is mentioned, with a participant stating that it should "exchange" velocity with the colliding molecule, although this is contested by another participant who notes that not all impacts are head-on.
  • Participants express uncertainty about how to model the final state of an atom after many collisions and how to relate it to the original velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of velocity distributions after collisions, the implications of distinguishability, and the modeling of collisions, indicating that multiple competing views remain and the discussion is unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding assumptions about collision dynamics, the dependence on definitions of distinguishability, and the unresolved nature of the mathematical modeling of final states in relation to original velocities.

Galedon
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Let us have an ideal gas. When we focus on a single atom, its movement should consist of straight lines from collision to collision. After each collision it should get a new random velocity according to Maxwell distribution. After N collisions, the position of the atom should correspond to a spherical gaussian distribution around its original position.

The question is: What should be the variance of this distribution in terms of thermodynamic parameters?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Galedon said:
Let us have an ideal gas. When we focus on a single atom, its movement should consist of straight lines from collision to collision. After each collision it should get a new random velocity according to Maxwell distribution.
Surely the new random velocity is not obtained directly from the Maxwell distribution. The distribution of resulting velocities should show bias based on the prior velocity.
 
Galedon said:
focus on a single atom,
"Distinguishable or indistinguishable;" i.e, mixture, or not? See "self diffusion" in Hirschfelder, et al.
 
Bystander said:
"Distinguishable or indistinguishable;" i.e, mixture, or not? See "self diffusion" in Hirschfelder, et al.
Thank you for answer.
Lets make an imaginary marker on it to make id distinguishable. I will look into the article (you mean the one from 1949, right?), but if you could point me a little further, I would be grateful.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Surely the new random velocity is not obtained directly from the Maxwell distribution. The distribution of resulting velocities should show bias based on the prior velocity.
In a hard-sphere model it should "exchange" its velocity with the random molecule it collided with.
 
Galedon said:
In a hard-sphere model it should "exchange" its velocity with the random molecule it collided with.
In a head on impact, yes. But not all impacts are head on.
 
jbriggs444 said:
In a head on impact, yes. But not all impacts are head on.
I see - but how to model it? The assumption is that "a lot" of collisions appeared, how to connect the final state with the original velocity?
 
Galedon said:
I see - but how to model it? The assumption is that "a lot" of collisions appeared, how to connect the final state with the original velocity?
I do not know.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K