A star for every grain of sand.

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicodopolis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star
AI Thread Summary
If a grain of sand represents an average star, the model suggests that the galaxy would span approximately 769,231 km across, comparable to the moon's orbit around Earth. Stars are not randomly distributed; they cluster in galaxies, with nearby stars about 5-10 light years apart and galaxies 2-5 million light years apart. The closest star, Alpha Centauri, would be roughly 33 km from our scaled-down Sun. The discussion also explores the possibility of estimating the universe's size and the average distance between stars if they were evenly spaced, proposing a distance of about 500 miles. Additionally, scaling the Sun down to the size of an atom raises questions about the visibility of the universe in this reduced scale.
nicodopolis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If this is true, could someone please tell me, if a grain of sand represented the size of an average star what would be the average distance between every grain of sand to give a approx size to the universe.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Stars aren't spread randomly throughout the universe - they are grouped together into galaxies.
In the centre of the galaxy stars can be very close together, near us they are around 5-10light years apart, galaxies are about 2-5million light years apart.

A star like the sun is around 1.3million km in diameter, a grain of sand is perhaps 1mm, a light year is around 10million million km
 
So, if the Sun is an average sized star, then a model of our galaxy with each sun the size of a grain of sand would be about 769,231 km across. Or the size of the moon's orbit around the Earth. Alpha Centauri, the closest star to our own would be 33 km from our Sun.
 
Thank you, though is it still possible to know the size of the universe and how many stars(grains of sand) fill it and then if they were equally distant from each other, what that distance would be? *** for a guess, would i be right in saying that the scaled down universe would be size of our galaxy for instance and if every grain of sand were equally distant from each other, that distance would be 500miles.
Also scaling down the sun to the size of an atom that makes up silver, would we be able to see the scaled down universe in a real sense.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top