A strange but reasonable solution for Helmholtz equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the 3D Helmholtz equation derived from Maxwell's equations, focusing on a non-standard solution involving different wave vectors for the electric field components Ex, Ey, and Ez, while maintaining equal magnitudes. The user initially questions the validity of this solution, as it deviates from the typical plane wave solutions found in literature. Responses indicate that such vortex-like solutions can indeed satisfy Maxwell's equations, and that they can be expressed as superpositions of plane waves. The conversation highlights the potential for diverse solutions beyond conventional plane waves, encouraging exploration of Fourier transformations for further analysis. Ultimately, the user acknowledges the compatibility of their findings with established electromagnetic theory.
qilong
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,
I have a question when solving 3D Helmholtz equation derived from Maxwell equations. Normally I will get a plane wave solution. But when I used the method of separation variables for the three components Ex Ey and Ez, I found that the vector k in these three can be different as long as their lengths are the same. So Ex has a phase of vector(kx)*vector(r), Ey has a phase of vector(ky)*vector(r) and Ez has a phase of vector(kz)*vector(r), where |kx|= |ky|=|kz|=Constant. Besides this solution meets all the conditions in Maxwell equations(as least I have calculated). Attached is two MATLAB codes describing the normal plane wave solution and this vortex-like solution in 2D situation. I haven't found any material describing this wired solution in EM theory. All of them give out plane wave solutions. Is there anything wrong with this solution? THANKS ALL!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Did you check that solution with Maxwell's equation? In particular, did you calculate the magnetic field, and put that into the equations?
The electric field looks interesting.
 
yes. I have check the magnetic field in the 3D case. The result shows that there is no need that the k vectors in these 3 components are the same. It is easy to verify this. And still I don't know where I got a mistake. Does the plot I attached seem unreasonable? Now I am a little skeptical about all the textbooks. Maybe they have hidden this result for some reason...:cry:
 
Plain waves are just one class of solutions - all superpositions of them are solutions, too. Maybe it is possible to write your solution as sum of different plain waves with different amplitude, phase and direction.
 
hmm...But I believe that the superstition of some plane waves cannot form a wave like this. 'cause that the phase factor is in the power part of exp. Even if a superstition cannot behave like this.
 
@mfb, Thanks, I've got it. Two plane wave can form a vortex-like wave which satisfies Maxwell equation. I have thought that the plane wave solution was the unique form. Attached are two plane wave solutions and another one is the superstition of them. From the plot you can see that two plane wave make a vortex-like wave which is of course compatible with Maxwell equation. Thank you so much!
 

Attachments

Well, it has to be possible. You can perform a Fourier transformation to get the components.
At least it is an interesting superposition ;).
 

Similar threads

Back
Top