A trick to solve functional integraltion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eljose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functional
eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
we know that the functional integrals are important in quantum field theory,but we have the problem that except for the semiclassical approach,they can not be solved anyway..but if we used the formula:.
\int{d[\phi]F[\phi]=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\phi^n{D^{n}F[\phi]}
where D is the functional derivative D=\delta/\delta{\phi}
this is the Bernoulli formula for the functional ,we could obtain an approach to the functional integral,wher \phi=\int{\phi}d^4x
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you tell me the reference for this expansion formula for functional, because if I take the definition of the first functional derivative i read : D_\eta[\phi]=\lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0}\frac{F[\phi+\epsilon\eta]-F[\phi]}{\epsilon}..this is the functional derivative of F in the "direction" \eta..since a functional is a function which has starting elements that are themself functions (functions can build a more than continuus infinite dimensional space)...this leads to the first order approximation : F[\phi+\epsilon\eta]\approx F[\phi]+\epsilon D_\eta[\phi]...the usual derivative is to put \eta(x)=\delta(x-y) and is written D_{\eta(x)=\delta(x-y)}F[\phi]=\frac{\delta F}{\delta\phi}[/tex].
Hence I get the expansion : F[\phi+\epsilon\eta]=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{\epsilon^n}{n!}D_\eta F[\phi]
In you expansion it is for me not clear what \phi^n means, since phi is a function, there exist different meaning : \phi(x)^n=\phi(x)\ldots\phi(x)\textrm{ and } \phi^n(x)=\phi(\cdots\phi(x)\cdots)
 
Last edited:
eljose said:
we know that the functional integrals are important in quantum field theory,but we have the problem that except for the semiclassical approach,they can not be solved anyway..but if we used the formula:.
\int{d[\phi]F[\phi]=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\phi^n{D^{n}F[\phi]}
where D is the functional derivative D=\delta/\delta{\phi}
this is the Bernoulli formula for the functional ,we could obtain an approach to the functional integral,wher \phi=\int{\phi}d^4x

LHS is a path integration over \phi. How did you drop that path on RHS i.e. \int{d[\phi] ?
 
If we consider the functional integration as the inverse of functional derivative let be G=\delta/\delta{\phi} then we have that the solution to the functional equation:

F[\phi]+\phi{DF[\phi]}=e^{iS[\phi]/\hbar} (1)

is F[\phi]=(1/\phi)\int{D[\phi]e^{iS/\hbar}

but the differential equation can be solve by iterations to get the series..

F[\phi]=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\phi^{n}G^{n}e^{iS/\hbar}

Unless of course is not true that for functionals...

G\int{D[\phi]e^{iS/\hbar}=e^{iS/\hbar}

so if we consider the functional integration as the inverse of functional derivative..we can construct a series expansion for the operator D^{-1}, in fact it is supposed that:

D[\phi]=Lim{j\rightarrow\infty}\Product{dx1.dx2.dx3...dxj}
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top