(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If we start with a Bell state

1/Sqrt(2)(|00>+|11>)

and (after moving the second qbit a significant distance away) apply the interferometer transformation

|0> -> 0.5(|0>+|1>)

|1> -> 0.5(|0>-|1>)

to the first qbit, we get

0.5/Sqrt(2)((|0>+|1>)|0>+(|0>-|1>)|1>)

=0.5/Sqrt(2)(|00>+|10>+|01>-|11>)

which gives equal probability of the first qbit ending up in |0> or |1>

Lets now start again with the same spatially separated Bell state but first apply the transformation

|0> -> 0.5(|0>+|1>)

|1> -> 0.5(|0>+|1>)

to the second qbit:

0.5/Sqrt(2)(|0>(|0>+|1>)+|1>(|0>+|1>))

=0.5/Sqrt(2)(|00>+|01>+|10>+|11>)

then apply the original (interferometer) transformation to the first qbit:

0.25/Sqrt(2)((|0>+|1>)|0>+(|0>+|1>)|1>+(|0>-|1>)|0>+(|0>-|1>)|1>)

=0.25/Sqrt(2)(|00>+|10>+|01>+|11>+|00>-|10>+|01>-|11>)

=0.5/Sqrt(2)(|00>+|01>)

Now, the first qbit is in state |0> with 100% (as opposed to 50%) probability as a result of what was done to the second one.

So...can anyone tell me if I made any false assumptions or stupid math mistakes here?

Dustin Soodak

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A variation of the Bell experiment

Tags:

Loading...

Similar Threads - variation Bell experiment | Date |
---|---|

I Bell's Theorem and Reality | Feb 13, 2018 |

Insights Mathematical Quantum Field Theory - Field Variations - Comments | Nov 12, 2017 |

I How to compute second-order variation of an action? | May 9, 2017 |

I Derivative = 0 is always minima? (Linear variational method) | Apr 11, 2017 |

B Guessing trial wave function with variational method | Dec 27, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**