Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A variation of the Bell experiment

  1. Nov 18, 2014 #1

    If we start with a Bell state


    and (after moving the second qbit a significant distance away) apply the interferometer transformation
    |0> -> 0.5(|0>+|1>)
    |1> -> 0.5(|0>-|1>)

    to the first qbit, we get
    which gives equal probability of the first qbit ending up in |0> or |1>

    Lets now start again with the same spatially separated Bell state but first apply the transformation

    |0> -> 0.5(|0>+|1>)
    |1> -> 0.5(|0>+|1>)
    to the second qbit:


    then apply the original (interferometer) transformation to the first qbit:

    Now, the first qbit is in state |0> with 100% (as opposed to 50%) probability as a result of what was done to the second one.

    So...can anyone tell me if I made any false assumptions or stupid math mistakes here?

    Dustin Soodak
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 18, 2014 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    This transformation isn't reversible, so I think you have to measure the state and collapse the wave function before doing the transformation. After collapsing the wave function, the state should be a mixed state, not a pure state, ie. with 50% chance the state is |0>(|0>+|1>), and with 50% chance the state is |1>(|0>+|1>).
  4. Nov 19, 2014 #3
    The way I've always seen it described in this sort of experiment, something counts as a measurement if the information about the state leaks out.
    I originally thought this transformation could be done (using photons as qbits) with an interferometer that has one path length 1/4 wavelength longer than the other. However, I suppose you could then get info about the photon's path information from the difference in travel time.
  5. Nov 19, 2014 #4


    Staff: Mentor

    Cant quite follow your idea here - information about state leaks out?

    In modern times an observation is generally considered to have occurred just after decoherence.

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook