A very challenging question regarding in basic algebra group theory?

jessicaw
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
1.Why Aut(G)=S_G implies G is trivial?
I search through the internet and no answer.2.Here is another very difficult conception question which has different answers from my professor and wikipedia:
Difference between Symmetry group,automorphism group and Permutation group?
From wikipedia:automorphism group is, "loosely" speaking, the symmetry group of the object.
My guess is Symmetry group equals Permutation group? and automorphism group is smaller?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The automorphism group is the set of functions which are group isomorphisms from G to G. So if we have the group Z4, the function f(x) with f(0)=0, f(1)=3, f(2)=2 and f(3)=1 is a group automorphism. The function with f(0)=0, f(1)=2, f(2)=0, f(3)=2 is not a group automorphism, because it's not an isomorphism, nor is f(0)=0, f(1)=2, f(2)=1, f(3)=3 because this isn't even a homomorphism.

Loosely speaking, you could say automorphism is a way to swap group elements that act equivalent: we can swap the 1 with the 3 because both are generators of Z4 (f(1)=3), but we can't swap the 1 and the 2 because they have different orders (f(1)=2).

SG is the set of all functions on G, which is sometimes called the permutation group of G because a permutation is just a general way to swap elements of G.

Symmetry groups refer to symmetries of geometric objects. Unless you have a geometric representation for your group it's not a symmetry group (for example, the set of reflections/rotations that take the unit square to itself in the plane forms a symmetry group)

So the question is asking why, if every function is an isomorphism from G to G, is G the trivial group? Think about properties that isomorphisms must have
 
jessicaw said:
1.Why Aut(G)=S_G implies G is trivial?

In short, because every group has a unique identity element.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top