A way to express scalar triple product from inter-vector angles?

DanAbnormal
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to find a general expression for the scalar triple product for 3 vectors in a simultaneous configuration, that depends only on the inter-vector angles, A1, A2 and A3.

I have expressed this quantity in terms of the spherical polar coordinates of the vectors (the length being unity for simplicity), and I have also expressed 3 equations for the dot product of each possible pair using spherical coordinates, to get a relation to the inter-vector angles.

Now I don't know if this is just a simple case of rearranging with trig identities, but I've been trying it for hours, can't find anything on the net and I'm not too good with Mathematica etc, so I was just wondering if there was a general expression, or a good lead to one.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Could you give an example of what you have?(the vectors) If I can't manually solve them, I may be able to help you punch them into mathematica.
 
Hi DanAbnormal :smile:
DanAbnormal said:
I'm trying to find a general expression for the scalar triple product for 3 vectors in a simultaneous configuration, that depends only on the inter-vector angles, A1, A2 and A3.

I have expressed this quantity in terms of the spherical polar coordinates of the vectors (the length being unity for simplicity) …

In other words: given the lengths of three sides of a spherical triangle (the lengths are the same as your inter-vector angles),

find the volume of the pyramid formed by the three vertices and the centre?

If you use one of the standard spherical trig formulas to find one of the angles of the triangle, you can put that vertex at the north pole, and then it's easy to find the cartesian coordinates of the other two vertices. :wink:
 
Im not sure if your answer is equivalent, though I'll post what I have more explicitly.

In Mathematica, I have specified the three following vectors in terms of their spherical polar angles:

x1 = 0 Degree;
x2 = 0 Degree;
x3 = 180 Degree;
z1 = 0 Degree;
z2 = 120 Degree;
z3 = 240 Degree;

where the preceding x's mean angle from x axis, and the same for z.
Now I have the cosine of each inter vector angle given by:

Angle1 = Sin[z2]*Sin[z3]*Cos[x2 - x3] + Cos[z2]*Cos[z3];
Angle2 = Sin[z1]*Sin[z3]*Cos[x1 - x3] + Cos[z1]*Cos[z3];
Angle3 = Sin[z1]*Sin[z3]*Cos[x1 - x3] + Cos[z1]*Cos[z3];

I can express the Scalar Triple Product in the following way:

Needs["VectorAnalysis`"]
(*First express our vectors in Spherical Polar Coordinates*)
v1 = CoordinatesToCartesian[{1, x1, z1}, Spherical];
v2 = CoordinatesToCartesian[{1, x2, z2}, Spherical];
v3 = CoordinatesToCartesian[{1, x3, z3}, Spherical];

N[ScalarTripleProduct[v1, v2, v3]]

I was wondering if there is a way to express this same triple product as a function of Angle1, Angle2, and Angle3 only, defined above. Can this be done in Mathematica?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top