A Language Spin: The Paradox of Zero Multiplication and Social Perception

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of zero multiplication and its implications in social perception. It explores whether Anna can claim to have twice as many coins as Bertus when both have zero coins, leading to conflicting statements about their coin amounts. Participants agree that mathematically, there is no paradox since any number multiplied by zero remains zero. However, they acknowledge that language can create a perception of contradiction, likening it to political spin where statements can be framed to convey different impressions. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the distinction between mathematical truth and social interpretation of statements.
Krokodzilla
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If Anna has 0 coins and Bertus has 0 coins aswell. Can you say that Anna has twice as much coins as Bertus? Because 2*0=0. But couldn`t you also say that Anna has four times more coins than Bertus, but simultaneously Bertus has 5 times more coins than Anna? Making it a paradox?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is not a paradox. Because for x=0, x=1x=2x=3x=4x=..., so you're just giving different names to the relationship between the two number of coins.
 
I agree with @Shyan that this isn't a paradox. The product of any finite number and zero is zero.
 
I agree mathimatically, but in a social concept where Anna says she has twice as much coins than Bertus, while Bertus can say at the same time he has 5 times more as coins than Anna.
 
Krokodzilla said:
If Anna has 0 coins and Bertus has 0 coins aswell. Can you say that Anna has twice as much coins as Bertus? Because 2*0=0. But couldn`t you also say that Anna has four times more coins than Bertus, but simultaneously Bertus has 5 times more coins than Anna? Making it a paradox?
No paradox. You want to solve the equation A=xB, where x is the multiplier of how many more coins Anna has than Bertus. Now since A = B, then x = 1, or A/B = 1.

0/0 , which is indeterminate in general, in this specific problem is a specific number, namely, 0/0 is 1. Anna has the same number of non-existing coins as Bertus, none, no more, no less.

Q.E.D.
 
Krokodzilla said:
I agree mathimatically, but in a social concept where Anna says she has twice as much coins than Bertus, while Bertus can say at the same time he has 5 times more as coins than Anna.
Its not a paradox even in that sense. You can test it. Tomorrow, go out and explain it to the first person you see and ask whether s\he thinks this is a paradox. Chances are very high that s\he tells you this is not a paradox and explains the reason very quickly.
 
If it`sa paradox ir not is not really my point, sorry english isn`t my native language. I mean can Anna say that she has twice as more coins than Bertus and Bertus can say at the same time that he has 5 tikes as much coins than Anna?
 
Krokodzilla said:
If it`sa paradox ir not is not really my point, sorry english isn`t my native language. I mean can Anna say that she has twice as more coins than Bertus and Bertus can say at the same time that he has 5 tikes as much coins than Anna?
Yes, because 0=0, no matter how those zeroes look like!
 
Krokodzilla said:
I agree mathimatically, but in a social concept where Anna says she has twice as much coins than Bertus, while Bertus can say at the same time he has 5 times more as coins than Anna.

Yes, it's a language paradox or a language spin, a better word. For example if you and I run a race and you beat me by a mile, I can say that I finished second while you came in next to last! It's expressing the truth in such a way as to give the opposite impression. That's what politicians call spin.
 

Similar threads

Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
98
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
2
Replies
61
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top