ABET accredited grad engineering program?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the surprising scarcity of ABET-accredited graduate engineering programs compared to undergraduate programs. Notably, prestigious institutions like UC Berkeley, Stanford, and USC lack ABET accreditation for their graduate engineering offerings. Two main theories are proposed to explain this phenomenon: first, ABET prioritizes accreditation for professional engineering programs over master's degrees, suggesting that the accreditation of MS programs is less critical; second, the lack of accreditation allows individuals with non-ABET accredited undergraduate degrees to pursue and obtain accredited graduate degrees. The conversation raises questions about the implications of these accreditation practices on the engineering profession and education.
phillip56
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am shocked that there are only a few schools which got their graduate engineering program accredited by ABET.

FYI, I used this website: http://main.abet.org/aps/Accreditedprogramsearch.aspx

For undergraduate programs, there are quite a few schools which have ABET accreditation.
For graduate programs, many schools do not have ABET accreditation.
For example, in California there are only three accredited graduate engineering programs. Schools like UC Berkeley, Stanford, USC don't have their grad engineering programs accredited?

It's mind-boggling... Anyone knows why this is the case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This has been discussed at my university on a few occasions and there are two schools of thought:

1) ABET is concerned with accrediting professional engineering programs more so than MS programs because an accredited MS doesn't matter as much as ungrad.

2) It allows individuals w/o ABET accredited undergraduate degrees to earn a graduate degree that is ABET accredited.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top