Courses About a course - Should I take it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physiker99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Course
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether to take an Intro to MEMS course given a lack of electronics lab experience and familiarity with prerequisite concepts. The course covers essential topics such as microelectromechanical systems design, fabrication processes, and device analysis. A prerequisite course, Electronic Techniques for Engineers, introduces fundamental electrical engineering principles, circuit analysis, and semiconductor devices, which the user admits to not understanding well. Participants encourage pursuing the MEMS course if there is genuine interest, noting that the interdisciplinary nature of MEMS will introduce concepts from the ground up. Familiarity with basic circuit theory and MOSFETs is recommended, but participants suggest that the course can be manageable even for those new to the subject. Reading suggestions for foundational knowledge in semiconductor devices are offered as additional support.
physiker99
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have interest on a course and I would like your opinions. I don't have much of an electronics lab experience except for freshman physics labs. I just finished my sophomore year.

I'd like to take an Intro to MEMS course, whose syllabus is as below:
Fundamentals of microelectromechanical systems including design, fabrication of microstructures; surface-micromachining, bulk-micromachining, LIGA, and other micro machining processes; fabrication principles of integrated circuit device and their applications for making MEMS devices; high-aspect-ratio microstructures; scaling issues in the micro scale (heat transfer, fluid mechanics and solid mechanics); device design, analysis, and mask layout.



As prerequisites, it requires a another class called Electronic Techniques for Engineers:
This course serves as an introduction to the principles of electrical engineering, starting from the basic concepts of voltage and current and circuit elements of resistors, capacitors, and inductors. Circuit analysis is taught using Kirchhoff's voltage and current laws with Thevenin and Norton equivalents. Operational amplifiers with feedback are introduced as basic building blocks for amplification and filtering. Semiconductor devices including diodes and MOSFETS and their IV characteristics are covered. Applications of diodes for rectification, and design of MOSFETs in common source amplifiers are taught. Digital logic gates and design using CMOS as well as simple flip-flops are introduced. Speed and scaling issues for CMOS are considered. The course includes as motivating examples designs of high level applications including logic circuits, amplifiers, power supplies, and communication links.

I definitely have no idea about Thevenin, MOSFETS CMOS etc. Do you think I should take it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,


if you are really interested in the topic then go for it.
MEMS is rather interdisciplinary, so basically the concepts would be introduced from the beginnings. I found my MEMS lecture to be fun.

What you should be familiar with (you can read it up,, nothing difficult):

-MOS transistor : aka MOSFET, basis of the CMOS
-Fabrication Technology: How MOSFETs are made
-Very basic circuit theory

The standard books for semiconductor devices are by Simon Sze, but you won't need these.
If you would like reading suggestions that are more suitable for you then let me know, so I can look further into my book shelf.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Back
Top