About calculus of variation and lagrangian formulation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
physlad
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I was reading about the principle of least action and how to derive Newton's second out of it.

at a certain point I didn't follow the calculations,

so the author defines a variation in the path, [tex]x(t) \longrightarrow x'(t) = x(t) + a(t), a \ll x[/tex]

[tex]a(t_1) = a(t_2) = 0[/tex]

Now, [tex]S \longrightarrow S' = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} (m/2 (\dot{x} +\dot{a})^2 - V(x +a)) dt[/tex]

[tex]= \int_{t_1}^{t_2} {1/2 m\dot{x}^2 + m\dot{x}\dot{a} - [V(x) + aV'(x)]} dt + O(a^2)[/tex]

(what happened exactly here? could anybody tell me??)

then

[tex]= S + \int_{t_1}^{t_2} [m\dot{x}\dot{a} - aV'(x)] dt[/tex]

[tex]\equiv S + \delta{S}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you meant

[tex] S \longrightarrow S' = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} (m/2 (\dot{x}(t) +\dot{a}(t))^2 - V(x(t) + a(t))) dt[/tex]

? It looks like they simply used a differential approximation. (i.e. a first-order Taylor series)
 
Yes, I got it. Thanks