Is Degeneracy in Quantum States Equally Probable in Thermodynamic Equilibrium?

hokhani
Messages
561
Reaction score
18
In Wikipedia this sentence is written about degeneracy;
In physics, two or more different quantum states are said to be degenerate if they are all at the same energy level. Statistically this means that they are all equally probable of being filled,
do you agree with the bold statement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this could be correct since the Boltzman distribution is given by:

$$p(E_i)=\frac{1}{Z}\exp^{-E_i/kT}$$

so the probability density of finding a particle in two state with the same energy should be the same.
 
If they are mutually accessible, and the system is in thermodynamic equilibrium. This is the "Postulate of Equal a Priori Probability."
 
To me this makes complete sense if you consider that the system is in thermodynamic equilibrium. Think of how it is less likely that particles occupy higher energy levels than lower ones. In
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top