About Feynman rules for an external field

Sleuth
Messages
46
Reaction score
4
Hi everybody, I'm new.
I'm approaching to QFT in these months and I have a couple of questions about Feynman rules.
The most of the books I have read (or tried to) explain feynman rules telling what you have to do when you have an internal or external line in a graph, and when you have a vertex, but I wasn't able to find a complete treatment and justification of what you have to do when you consider an external field.
For example what happens when I want to study the scattering of an electron with an external electric of magnetic field? Let's say we are in QED: do I simply have to multiply the vertex for the external field (say ieA^\mu \gamma_mu)? and why? do I have to integrate over the momenta of the external fields? can I use the conservation of momenta on the modified vertex in the same way?
I understand that maybe this is a really trivial question, but I would like to find someone explaining this in a complete and not-misleading way.
Thank you all
S.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An external field is represented by an external line. It is an incoming photon and it carries some momentum and polarization. As with all external lines, you label the line with a momentum p and a spin s (it will then hit some vertex where stuff like momentum conservation is imposed). They also contribute an overall factor: the line is external so there is some incoming and outcoming orientation, the polarization of the vector (notation: \epsilon_\mu(k)).

See for instance Griffiths - Introduction to Elementary particles, chapter 7.6 and example 7.4.

Note that this is the contribution of the scattering of a very specific photon (carrying momentum p and a polarization). We can average over the polarization, and impose some distribution on the momenta p - this gives a more realistic description of the external field.
 
I think you just multiply the amplitude with the Fourier transformation of the external field, taken at the 4-momentum value that conserves 4-momentum for the entire process. So if you have an incoming electron with momentum p, and outgoing electron with momentum p', then you would multiply your amplitude by A(p-p') or A(p'-p). Which one I think depends on your choice of metric, (+1,-1-1-1) or (-1,+1,+1,+1), and also how you define the Fourier transform of the external field (whether your formula is integral of A(q)e^(-iqx) or integral of A(q)e^(+iqx).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top