Understanding Normal Ordering: Anhillation and Creation Operators Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter kashokjayaram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal
kashokjayaram
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
In normal ordering method the anhillation operators are put in the left and creation operators on the right. What happens when we try to normal order the product of two anhillation operators or two creation operators (as in the case of complex scalar fields). What are we doing there actually..??

:a^\daggerb^\dagger: = ??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have two annihilation operator or two creation operation sandwiched between vacuum states,you will not be able to get the vacuum after annihilating two times vacuum(annihilation operator acting on vacuum will give automatically zero) or creating something out of vacuum twice.You have to create something and then annihilate it to get vacuum again.
In general,you have to decompose the field into sums of some fields like,
$$ψ(x)=ψ^+(x)+ψ^-(x)$$,where one part will be responsible for creation and other part for annihilation.
 
In quantizing the complex field, there will be creation of particle and antiparticle -terms. They will come as a product in hamiltonian. After the normal ordering process I can't see such terms involving in the hamiltonian. Thats why the question.

Expecting the answer...!
 
when you are writing the product of fields,you have to decompose the fields into creation and annihilation part as I written above,and then you can get a normal ordering.After doing it you use the commutation relations between fields and try to get a contribution for energy.You have to define some number operators like $$N_a=a^{\dagger}a$$
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top