MHB Absolute Value Graph: Explaining |2-x| Horizontal Translation Right

buttretler
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain to me why |2-x| would have a horizontal translation to the right? When I've always been taught that anytime you see a [+] it will translate to the left. The graph would be a regular |x| graph but it is shift 2 spots to the right. Thanks to anyone for help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ineedhelppp said:
Can someone explain to me why |2-x| would have a horizontal translation to the right? When I've always been taught that anytime you see a [+] it will translate to the left. The graph would be a regular |x| graph but it is shift 2 spots to the right. Thanks to anyone for help

There are several ways of thinking about this. One way: $|2-x|=|x-2|$, so you can see that it must be shifted to the right. In addition, one way of thinking about shifting is to ask yourself at what value of $x$ will the stuff inside the magnitudes be zero? That value of $x$ is going to have the corner that $|x|$ normally does at the origin. The nice thing about this second way of thinking is that it works for positive or negative shifts. Does this answer your question?
 
I think the second way I understand better, it still leaves me hazey because if |x-2|=|2-x| would mean no shift is taking place. And the only way at my level to show it is to the right, is a table of values with f(0),f(1) and f(2). Either way thanks for the further inlightenment.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top