Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Absorbing kinetic energy

  1. Dec 10, 2003 #1
    Is there a way that the kinetic energy of a moving object can be locally and internally absorbed or otherwise altered without outside influence?
    For example, let's say that I have a container that has been fired out of a cannon at 100 mph. Now, this container has an abundant internal energy source available for anything expect outside thrust, as outside thrust is not permitted in any way(for this experiment)
    Since the internal mass of the container is a direct function of the containers kinetic energy, can the internal mass be manipulated in-flight such to where the manipulation changes the strength or vectors of the containers kinetic energy?
    Again, for example, if there were 2 lead balls of x-amount of weight affixed on the inside side walls of the container, and the internal energy source cause them to be violently pulled together towards the center of the container, does this action in any way affect the total kinetic energy of the containers motion?
    Thank you greatly for your time and expertise.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 10, 2003 #2

    NateTG

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The linear mometum cannot be changed without outside interaction, but you can increase the kinetic energy by having parts of the projectile move relative to each other. If you want the system to be closed, then this would only affect the projectile's rotational kinetic energy.
     
  4. Dec 10, 2003 #3
    NateTG:

    I understand what you have said, and I appreciate your comments. So is their no way at all to decay single vector kinetic energy in a closed system?
    Thank you for your continued time.
     
  5. Dec 10, 2003 #4
    "Closed" meaning free-flight with no additional external influence. Static systems(i.e. shock absorbers with earth-ground reactionary forces)are understood not to be applicable in this scenario.
     
  6. Dec 11, 2003 #5

    Stingray

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Kinetic energy has no direction. I think you mean momentum.

    Anyways, a closed system cannot change its own momentum if Newton's 3rd law is obeyed. Electromagnetism doesn't follow Newton's laws, so it is possible to alter your trajectory in flight.
     
  7. Dec 11, 2003 #6

    Integral

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This is news to me, could you please elaborate.
     
  8. Dec 11, 2003 #7

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I believe some electromagnetic interactions do violate Newton's third law. (But in my coffee-deprived state I can't think of any specifics.) However, I don't agree that this implies a violation of momentum conservation. It would imply it, if Newton's third law were required for momentum conservation to hold, but I don't think that's true. Conservation of momentum is more fundamental than Newton's third law.

    Hopefully there's an expert in the wings who can confirm this.
     
  9. Dec 11, 2003 #8

    Stingray

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Look at the Biot-Savart law for example. Its very simple to set up situations which violate the strong form of the 3rd law (non-parallel wires).

    In more dynamic situations, you can violate the weak form as well. This is mentioned in the Feynman lectures for example.

    Momentum conservation still works as long as you take account of the momentum contained in the fields. If you only look at the material objects, momentum can be changed.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Absorbing kinetic energy
  1. Kinetic energy (Replies: 5)

  2. Kinetic Energy (Replies: 5)

Loading...