Abstract Algebra: Solving with Cosets

ZZ Specs
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Suppose H is a subgroup of G. For g in G, define fg : G/H > G/H by fg (aH) = gaH for a in G, where G/H is the set of left cosets of H in G.

I know that fg is a well-defined permutation. However, we have not established (yet) that G/H is a group.

2 parts to the question:

1) for a given aH in G/H, find the set {g in G : fg(aH) = aH }

2) find the set {g in G : fg = the identity permutation in G/H}



The Attempt at a Solution



I have done part (1), finding the solution set {g in G : g = aha-1 for some h in H}.

However, I struggle with part (2), as we have no information on a or H so I'm not sure what counts as a solution. I feel that normality may be involved but I cannot find out how to use it.

I know we want g such that fg(aH) = gaH = aH for all cosets aH ; this is the identity permutation. By equality of cosets, we can say that a-1ga = h for some a in G and h in H, or that g = aha-1 for some a in H and g in G, but I'm not sure if this consitutes a solution.

Any help is very much appreciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ZZ Specs said:

Homework Statement

Suppose H is a subgroup of G. For g in G, define fg : G/H > G/H by fg (aH) = gaH for a in G, where G/H is the set of left cosets of H in G.

I know that fg is a well-defined permutation. However, we have not established (yet) that G/H is a group.

2 parts to the question:

1) for a given aH in G/H, find the set {g in G : fg(aH) = aH }

2) find the set {g in G : fg = the identity permutation in G/H}

The Attempt at a Solution



I have done part (1), finding the solution set {g in G : g = aha-1 for some h in H}.

However, I struggle with part (2), as we have no information on a or H so I'm not sure what counts as a solution. I feel that normality may be involved but I cannot find out how to use it.

I know we want g such that fg(aH) = gaH = aH for all cosets aH ; this is the identity permutation. By equality of cosets, we can say that a-1ga = h for some a in G and h in H, or that g = aha-1 for some a in H and g in G, but I'm not sure if this consitutes a solution.

Any help is very much appreciated. Thank you.

The only difference between 1) and 2) is that for 1) it has to be true for single value of a. For 2) it has to be true for all values of a in G.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top