Accelerating a Car: Min Time to Reach Speed v

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum time required for a car to accelerate from rest to a speed v, given its mass m and engine power P. The initial approach uses the relationship between power, work, and time, leading to the equation t = mv²/P. However, a correction is noted regarding the factor of 1/2, which arises from considering kinetic energy as the work done by the engine. The correct formula is established as t = mv²/2P, highlighting the importance of average force in the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between work done and kinetic energy in this context.
Kyoma
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A car of mass m has an engine which can deliver power P. What is the minimum time in which the car can be accelerated from rest to a speed v?


2. The attempt at a solution

P = W/t
(W is work done, t is time)

F = ma

So,
P = Fs/t
(F is force, s is distance)
P = mas/t
Making t as the subject,
t = mas/P
t = mv2/P

Is there any thing wrong with my final equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am missing a factor of 1/2. Probably you forgot to take an average somewhere...
An easier way might be from an energy consideration: the amount of work that the engine needs to do, is at least the added kinetic energy, right?
 
If I use kinetic energy, instead of work done,

then the equation becomes:

t = mv2/2P

Which is the correct answer then? And what factor 1/2?
 
Exactly. Note that there is an extra 2 in the denominator now. That's the factor of 1/2 I am talking about.

(By the way, it is not "instead of work done"... the kinetic energy is precisely the work done. You meant, "instead of forces" :))
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top