Accelerating Current: Does Bending a Wire Produce EM Radiation?

AI Thread Summary
Bending a wire causes the current, or flow of charge, to change direction, which raises the question of whether this produces electromagnetic (EM) radiation. While accelerating charged particles can generate radiation, a steady current in a bent wire does not produce radiation because it maintains a constant charge density and electric field. In contrast, charged particles in circular paths, like those in synchrotrons, do emit radiation due to their changing electric fields. The confusion arises from the difference between steady currents and the dynamic conditions in particle accelerators. Ultimately, bending a wire does not lead to radiation under steady current conditions.
SandeshPhy
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Current is simply flow of charge,
and acceleration of charged particles produces EM radiation.
Then if we bend a wire,charges(current) would be accelerated as they change direction,then a bent wire must radiate.Is it true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Radiation is produced by a changing current, or a changing charge distribution. A steady current does not produce radiation, even in a circular wire.
 
When charged particles, electrons, protons etc, are traveling in circular paths in accelerators they produce radiation sometimes know as synchrotron radiation.
Some synchrotrons are used as sources of X-rays.
 
technician said:
When charged particles, electrons, protons etc, are traveling in circular paths in accelerators they produce radiation sometimes know as synchrotron radiation.
Some synchrotrons are used as sources of X-rays.

But then even steady current moving in curved path is same as electrons moving in synchrotons.the electrons do radiate so why doesn't the current(which is simply flow of electrons)?

I am totally confused here?
 
A steady current in a circular wire has a constant charge density throughout. Maxwell's equations gives zero/constant electric field (if the wire is approx. zero charge or charged) and constant magnetic field - no radiation. An electron in a cyclotron does NOT have a constant charge density so the electric field is time dependent. For that matter the magnetic field would be more complicated too!

The way I understood the first post I imagined bending a wire as charge was flowing through it - in this case there would be radiation of course, since the magnetic field would change.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top