Accelerating trajectories in relativity

twinsen
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am trying to write a code to find the minimum time until a sphere of expanding light interacts with a set of N particles moving at speed. These particles are acted on by forces which remain constant over the time period.

My problem at the moment is that these particles have a mass and therefore should be restricted to v<c.

At higher speeds am I right to say that it takes relatively more energy to add speed, where an infinite energy/force would be required to get to c??

What would this acceleration velocity dependence be?? I presume I can then just integrate this along with the initial velocities to get the position as a function of time.

I am really just unsure as to how to apply relativity in this case where the particles are accelerating under a force..

Thanks in advance.

Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
twinsen said:
[...]
What would this acceleration velocity dependence be?? I presume I can then just integrate this along with the initial velocities to get the position as a function of time.

I am really just unsure as to how to apply relativity in this case where the particles are accelerating under a force..
[...]

Basically, you need to use a quantity (often called "rapidity") that is related to ordinary velocity (it's just a one-to-one non-linear transformation of velocity) that has the useful property that it adds linearly across inertial reference frames (ordinary velocity DOESN'T).

Taylor & Wheeler use it in their SPACETIME PHYSICS book, and I imagine most other good special relativity books do too. I think T&W used rapidity in an example showing how far a traveler could get, if constantly accelerating at 1g, in one human lifetime.

I also use rapidity in my paper on accelerating observers:

"Accelerated Observers in Special Relativity", PHYSICS ESSAYS, December 1999, p629.

If you don't already have T&W's book, that would be a good purchase no matter what. As I recall, the very first edition may not have had all the worked examples that later versions had, so try to get the latest one.

Mike Fontenot
 
Yeh that's great. Exactly what I was looking for :)

I will try and find Wheeler's book when I go back to uni! Really should remember all this stuff but sometimes it's quicker to ask.

Cheers

Alex
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top