Accelerating trajectories in relativity

twinsen
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am trying to write a code to find the minimum time until a sphere of expanding light interacts with a set of N particles moving at speed. These particles are acted on by forces which remain constant over the time period.

My problem at the moment is that these particles have a mass and therefore should be restricted to v<c.

At higher speeds am I right to say that it takes relatively more energy to add speed, where an infinite energy/force would be required to get to c??

What would this acceleration velocity dependence be?? I presume I can then just integrate this along with the initial velocities to get the position as a function of time.

I am really just unsure as to how to apply relativity in this case where the particles are accelerating under a force..

Thanks in advance.

Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
twinsen said:
[...]
What would this acceleration velocity dependence be?? I presume I can then just integrate this along with the initial velocities to get the position as a function of time.

I am really just unsure as to how to apply relativity in this case where the particles are accelerating under a force..
[...]

Basically, you need to use a quantity (often called "rapidity") that is related to ordinary velocity (it's just a one-to-one non-linear transformation of velocity) that has the useful property that it adds linearly across inertial reference frames (ordinary velocity DOESN'T).

Taylor & Wheeler use it in their SPACETIME PHYSICS book, and I imagine most other good special relativity books do too. I think T&W used rapidity in an example showing how far a traveler could get, if constantly accelerating at 1g, in one human lifetime.

I also use rapidity in my paper on accelerating observers:

"Accelerated Observers in Special Relativity", PHYSICS ESSAYS, December 1999, p629.

If you don't already have T&W's book, that would be a good purchase no matter what. As I recall, the very first edition may not have had all the worked examples that later versions had, so try to get the latest one.

Mike Fontenot
 
Yeh that's great. Exactly what I was looking for :)

I will try and find Wheeler's book when I go back to uni! Really should remember all this stuff but sometimes it's quicker to ask.

Cheers

Alex
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top