Accelerating trajectories in relativity

twinsen
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am trying to write a code to find the minimum time until a sphere of expanding light interacts with a set of N particles moving at speed. These particles are acted on by forces which remain constant over the time period.

My problem at the moment is that these particles have a mass and therefore should be restricted to v<c.

At higher speeds am I right to say that it takes relatively more energy to add speed, where an infinite energy/force would be required to get to c??

What would this acceleration velocity dependence be?? I presume I can then just integrate this along with the initial velocities to get the position as a function of time.

I am really just unsure as to how to apply relativity in this case where the particles are accelerating under a force..

Thanks in advance.

Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
twinsen said:
[...]
What would this acceleration velocity dependence be?? I presume I can then just integrate this along with the initial velocities to get the position as a function of time.

I am really just unsure as to how to apply relativity in this case where the particles are accelerating under a force..
[...]

Basically, you need to use a quantity (often called "rapidity") that is related to ordinary velocity (it's just a one-to-one non-linear transformation of velocity) that has the useful property that it adds linearly across inertial reference frames (ordinary velocity DOESN'T).

Taylor & Wheeler use it in their SPACETIME PHYSICS book, and I imagine most other good special relativity books do too. I think T&W used rapidity in an example showing how far a traveler could get, if constantly accelerating at 1g, in one human lifetime.

I also use rapidity in my paper on accelerating observers:

"Accelerated Observers in Special Relativity", PHYSICS ESSAYS, December 1999, p629.

If you don't already have T&W's book, that would be a good purchase no matter what. As I recall, the very first edition may not have had all the worked examples that later versions had, so try to get the latest one.

Mike Fontenot
 
Yeh that's great. Exactly what I was looking for :)

I will try and find Wheeler's book when I go back to uni! Really should remember all this stuff but sometimes it's quicker to ask.

Cheers

Alex
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top