- #1
jason12345
- 109
- 0
This is question 5.8 from Rindler's Relativity: Special, General, Cosmological book, with A, U the 4 acceleration and velocity; a, u the 3 acceleration and velocity. It has 3 parts which I think I've answered correctly below, but need help with the last part.
So could you have a look and comment on it?
a) Prove that, in any inertial frame where a is orthogonal to u, [tex]\textbf{A}= \gamma^{2} (\textbf{a},0)[/tex], and conversely.
my answer:
[tex]\dot{\gamma}=\gamma^{3}/c^{2}\textbf{a}\cdot\textbf{u}[/tex]
[tex]\textbf{a}\cdot\textbf{u} = 0 [/tex]
[tex]\textbf{A}= \gamma d\textbf{U}/dt = \gamma d/dt(\gamma\textbf{u},\gamma c) = \gamma(\dot{\gamma}\textbf{u} + \gamma\textbf{a}, \dot{\gamma}c ) [/tex]
and so
[tex]\textbf{A}= \gamma^{2} (\textbf{a},0)[/tex] --- (1)
which proves the first part.
Given (1), then
[tex] \dot{\gamma}c = 0 [/tex] and so
[tex]\dot{\gamma}=\gamma^{3}/c^{2}\textbf{a}\cdot\textbf{u} = 0 [/tex]
which is only possible for [tex]\textbf{a}\cdot\textbf{u} = 0 [/tex]
Hence the converse is also true.
b) Deduce that for any instantaneous motion it is possible to find an inertial frame S_|_ in which a, u are orthogonal to one another.
my answer:
In s_|_ , [tex]\textbf{A}= \gamma^{2} (\textbf{a},0)[/tex]
I need to show [tex]\dot{\gamma}c[/tex] in A can transform to 0 in S_|_:
[tex]\gamma_{v}(\gamma_{u}\dot{\gamma_{u}} - v(\gamma_{u}\mathbf{a_{x}} + \dot{\gamma_{u}}\mathtbf{u_{x}})/c^{2}) = 0 [/tex]
[tex] v = \gamma_{u}\dot{\gamma_{u}}c^{2} / (\gamma_{u}\mathbf{a_{x}} + \dot{\gamma_{u}}\mathbf{u_{x}})[/tex]
[tex] v = \gamma_{u}^{4}\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{u} / (\gamma_{u}\mathbf{a_{x}} + \dot{\gamma_{u}}\mathbf{u_{x}})[/tex]--- (2)
Hence there exists a v and therefore s_|_.
c) Moreover, prove that there is a whole class of such frames, all moving relative to S_|_ in directions orthogonal to a.
My answer:
The stationary frame can be rotated giving a new a_x, u_x in (2) and hence another v and s_|_. But I can't show they're moving relative to S_|_ in directions orthogonal to a.
Thanks for your help.
So could you have a look and comment on it?
a) Prove that, in any inertial frame where a is orthogonal to u, [tex]\textbf{A}= \gamma^{2} (\textbf{a},0)[/tex], and conversely.
my answer:
[tex]\dot{\gamma}=\gamma^{3}/c^{2}\textbf{a}\cdot\textbf{u}[/tex]
[tex]\textbf{a}\cdot\textbf{u} = 0 [/tex]
[tex]\textbf{A}= \gamma d\textbf{U}/dt = \gamma d/dt(\gamma\textbf{u},\gamma c) = \gamma(\dot{\gamma}\textbf{u} + \gamma\textbf{a}, \dot{\gamma}c ) [/tex]
and so
[tex]\textbf{A}= \gamma^{2} (\textbf{a},0)[/tex] --- (1)
which proves the first part.
Given (1), then
[tex] \dot{\gamma}c = 0 [/tex] and so
[tex]\dot{\gamma}=\gamma^{3}/c^{2}\textbf{a}\cdot\textbf{u} = 0 [/tex]
which is only possible for [tex]\textbf{a}\cdot\textbf{u} = 0 [/tex]
Hence the converse is also true.
b) Deduce that for any instantaneous motion it is possible to find an inertial frame S_|_ in which a, u are orthogonal to one another.
my answer:
In s_|_ , [tex]\textbf{A}= \gamma^{2} (\textbf{a},0)[/tex]
I need to show [tex]\dot{\gamma}c[/tex] in A can transform to 0 in S_|_:
[tex]\gamma_{v}(\gamma_{u}\dot{\gamma_{u}} - v(\gamma_{u}\mathbf{a_{x}} + \dot{\gamma_{u}}\mathtbf{u_{x}})/c^{2}) = 0 [/tex]
[tex] v = \gamma_{u}\dot{\gamma_{u}}c^{2} / (\gamma_{u}\mathbf{a_{x}} + \dot{\gamma_{u}}\mathbf{u_{x}})[/tex]
[tex] v = \gamma_{u}^{4}\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{u} / (\gamma_{u}\mathbf{a_{x}} + \dot{\gamma_{u}}\mathbf{u_{x}})[/tex]--- (2)
Hence there exists a v and therefore s_|_.
c) Moreover, prove that there is a whole class of such frames, all moving relative to S_|_ in directions orthogonal to a.
My answer:
The stationary frame can be rotated giving a new a_x, u_x in (2) and hence another v and s_|_. But I can't show they're moving relative to S_|_ in directions orthogonal to a.
Thanks for your help.