Acceleration across a frictionless surface

AI Thread Summary
When an object is pushed on a frictionless surface, it accelerates according to Newton's second law (F=ma). Once the applied force is removed, the object stops accelerating and continues at a constant velocity, as per Newton's first law. For example, pushing a 100kg object with 200N for 2 seconds results in a final velocity of 4m/s. This velocity remains constant indefinitely on a frictionless surface after the force is no longer applied. The discussion clarifies the relationship between force, mass, acceleration, and motion in the absence of friction.
Sammy101
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am confused on the topic of friction. I thought of a question that I cannot answer.

What happens if you push an object with a certain amount of force and mass on a frictionless surface? According to F=ma, you will be able to get the acceleration of the object, but how will you know when the object stops acceleration? Will the object accelerate infinitely?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As soon as you stop applying force to the object it will cease accelerating. IE if you push a block, as soon as you take your hand off or stop pushing it will cease accelerating.
 
And so then it will just continue at a constant velocity right?

So, if you pushed on a 100kg object with 200N of force for 2s and then let go on a frictionless surface, the objects final velocity would be 4m/s because:

F=ma
200N=100kg(a)
a=2m/s^2

t=2s
velocity= 2m/s^2(2s) = 4m/s and that's how fast it would travel forever on a frictionless surface?
 
Yes, as soon as the force applied ceases, the object will continue at whatever velocity it was when you removed the force.
 
Thank you!
 
Newton's first law & 2nd law
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top