Acceleration and thrust of a rocket

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of rocket thrust and acceleration, particularly focusing on the equations governing these phenomena. Participants explore the relationships between thrust, mass flow rate, gravitational forces, and resulting acceleration and velocity of a rocket over time.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes an equation for thrust and acceleration, suggesting that upward thrust equals the mass flow rate times the exhaust velocity, while downward force is the mass times gravitational acceleration.
  • Another participant questions the formulation of the thrust equation and suggests an alternative approach using the momentum principle, indicating that the net force is the sum of thrust and gravitational force.
  • Concerns are raised about the initial velocity being negative in the plotted results, with one participant noting that the initial conditions for velocity and position should typically be zero.
  • A participant discusses the importance of considering atmospheric conditions and dynamic loads on fuel efficiency during rocket ascent.
  • Some participants express disagreement regarding the use of different formulations for force in variable mass systems, with one asserting that F=ma is more applicable than F=dp/dt in this context.
  • There is a mention of the need for clarity in how velocity was calculated, with calls for more detailed explanations of the integration process used to derive it.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the correct formulation of thrust and acceleration equations, as well as the implications of initial conditions on velocity. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached on these points.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of variables such as thrust and exhaust velocity, as well as the initial conditions for the rocket's motion. The discussion also highlights the complexity of modeling variable mass systems in dynamics.

warfreak131
Messages
186
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I want to know if I have an equation on thrust correct. I figured what's the acceleration as a function of time.

You have the upward thrust = dm/dt v, assuming the mass flow rate and the gas ejection rate is constant

and the downward force = -m(t) g, where m=m(t) since it's losing fuel as it travels

so:
dm/dt v - m(t) g = m(t) a

where m(t) = m0 - dm/dt t

dm/dt v - (m0 - dm/dt t)g = (m0-dm/dt t)a

Divide both sides by m(t)

(dm/dt v)/(m0 - dm/dt t) - g = a

I plotted this function for dm/dt = 10, v = 10, m = 1000

The red line represents the acceleration, and the blue line represents the velocity. The acceleration line looks correct, like the acceleration starts off slow, but as the rocket loses mass, it begins to accelerate at a faster rate, but the velocity is where I'm concerned, why is the initial velocity almost -700 m/s?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-1.jpg
    Untitled-1.jpg
    6 KB · Views: 586
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure why upward thrust is dm/dt v

Isn't Fnet = dp/dt = d(mv)/dt = dm/dt v + m dv/dt ?

So gravity: Fg = - m(t) g
Trust: Ft = ?

Fnet = Fg + Ft = -m(t)g + Ft = dm/dt v(t) + m(t) dv/dt

v(t) = v0 + dv/dt t

So

-m(t)g + Ft = dm/dt (v0 + dv/dt t) + m(t) dv/dt
-m(t)g + Ft = dm/dt v0 + dm/dt dv/dt t + m(t) dv/dt

dv/dt = (Ft - m(t)g - dm/dt v0 ) / [dm/dt t + m(t)]
= [Ft - (m0 + dm/dt t)g - dm/dt v0] / (dm/dt t + m0 + dm/dt t)
= ( Ft - m0g - dm/dt gt - dm/dt v0 ) / (dm/dt t + m0 + dm/dt t)
= (Ft - m0g - dm/dt (gt + v0) / (2 dm/dt t + m0)

Then I guess you can select arbitrary constants for Ft, m0, v0, dm/dt. For v0 we can probably assume it's 0.
 
Your model will use less fuel if your throttle takes into account the dynamic load of the atmosphere - the interplay between increasing air speed and decreasing air density with elevation.

When the rocket's air speed comes to equal the exhaust gas exit speed, the fuel is being deposited without any residual forward or backward velocity into the still air behind the rocket. This is peak efficiency. The period of flight enjoying this peak may be extended with careful management of the throttle with respect to air speed and atmospheric density.
 
warfreak131 said:
I plotted this function for dm/dt = 10, v = 10, m = 1000

The red line represents the acceleration, and the blue line represents the velocity. The acceleration line looks correct, like the acceleration starts off slow, but as the rocket loses mass, it begins to accelerate at a faster rate, but the velocity is where I'm concerned, why is the initial velocity almost -700 m/s?

Your result of a = \frac { v \frac {dm}{dt} } {m_0 - t \frac {dm}{dt} } - g is correct, note that v is the exhaust speed of the rocket, and not the speed of the rocket itself.
I've no idea how you got the graph however.

If you want to solve the differential equation, you can choose the initial position and the initial speed. Ordinarily you would choose 0 for both, and then there is no way in which the initial speed suddenly could become -700m/s, because the initial acceleration is finite.

If the exhaust speed is 10 m/s (very slow for any kind of rocket), the inital acceleration is
10*10/1000 - g = -9 m/s, so the rocket is far too weak to lift itself off the ground.
The graph for the acceleration, really can't be correct whatever your exhaust spee is, since the acceleration after 80s with only a fifth of the mass left, should be at least 5 times as big as the initial acceleration.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Surely:
$$\sum F = \frac{dp}{dt} = v\frac{dm}{dt}+m\frac{dv}{dt}$$
Surely not.

arildno said:
This is completely wrong, from most posters. See post 4 in the following thread, and for that matter, the rest of it.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=72176
That, too, is wrong.

There's no difference between F=ma and F=dp/dt for constant mass systems. There's a huge difference between the two for variable mass systems, and (IMHO) the only definition that makes sense in this case is F=ma. With F=ma, force is measurable and it is invariant across all inertial reference frames. With F=dp/dt, force is not measurable and it is a frame-dependent quantity. Yech! The vast majority of people who work with dynamic mass systems use F=ma, not F=dp/dt.
This imbroglio over F=ma vs F=dp/dt has made everyone miss the key problem in the original post. So, going back to the OP,

warfreak131 said:
The red line represents the acceleration, and the blue line represents the velocity. The acceleration line looks correct, like the acceleration starts off slow, but as the rocket loses mass, it begins to accelerate at a faster rate, but the velocity is where I'm concerned, why is the initial velocity almost -700 m/s?
warfreak131, you didn't show us how you calculated velocity, so there's no knowing where you went wrong.

We have
a = \frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{\dot m}{m_0-\dot m t} v_e - g
where ##\dot m##, ##m_0##, ##v_e##, and ##g## are constants. Note well: There are two velocities here. One is ##v##, the velocity of the rocket. The other is ##v_e##, the effective velocity of the exhaust with respect to the rocket.

This is a first order linear ordinary differential equation. There's no mention of the initial velocity. It's an arbitrary constant. You know the value of that arbitrary constant; it's zero in a frame in which the the rocket is at rest at t=0. The solution to that ODE is similar to that of the ideal rocket equation. The addition of the (constant) downward gravitational adds a slight twist. It's still a linear ODE, so all the tools that apply to linear ODEs still work on this problem.
 
Last edited:
"
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=72176

That, too, is wrong.

There's no difference between F=ma and F=dp/dt for constant mass systems. There's a huge difference between the two for variable mass systems, and (IMHO) the only definition that makes sense in this case is F=ma. With F=ma, force is measurable and it is invariant across all inertial reference frames. With F=dp/dt, force is not measurable and it is a frame-dependent quantity. Yech! The vast majority of people who work with dynamic mass systems use F=ma, not F=dp/dt."
------------------------------
Which is what that thread is working on. Don't say anything is wrong when you clearly haven't read it.
 
warfreak131, you didn't show us how you calculated velocity, so there's no knowing where you went wrong.

I calculated velocity of the rocket by integrating the function for acceleration w.r.t time.

Not sure why upward thrust is dm/dt v

Isn't that how thrust is defined?

is correct, note that v is the exhaust speed of the rocket, and not the speed of the rocket itself.

Yes, I am aware. In my original post, I specified that v was for gas ejection. Although I should have specified that the velocity in the graph is the velocity of the rocket.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
warfreak131 said:
I calculated velocity of the rocket by integrating the function for acceleration w.r.t time.
The problem is that you haven't show us how you did that. You obviously did something wrong. We can't help you find out what you did wrong if you don't show us what you did.

So, how did you do that integration?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K