Acceleration Calculation: 8s to 12s, 64m

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gadget
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curiosity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating acceleration based on the distance traveled by a car over a specific time interval. Measuring 64 meters from 8 to 12 seconds does not provide enough information to determine acceleration, as it could indicate constant velocity or various rates of acceleration. To accurately calculate acceleration, at least three variables are needed, such as displacement, initial and final velocities, and time. The lack of initial distance traveled before the measurement complicates the ability to derive acceleration. Therefore, without additional data, the acceleration cannot be determined.
Gadget
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have a question just out of curiosity, say that a car is driving along and as it travels, I start to measure the distance from when the car has traveled 8 seconds to 12 seconds, and find out that it is 64 meters. I do not know the distance it traveled before I started to measure(ie. before the 64 meters). What is my acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's impossible to say.

You could have been traveling with constant velocity (acceleration=0), and covered 64 metres in those 4 seconds (at 16m/s) or you could have been accelerating with uniform acceleration of 8m/s^2 from 0m/s to 32m/s, or in fact anything in between.

You don't have enough information to answer your question.
 
The time to cover a specific distance will tell you your average speed but you would need another interval, to get a different speed, to find an average acceleration.
 
In any of the basic kinematics equations you need at least three variables to solve for the rest of them. For example, you give only the displacement and the change in time. When I took Gen Physics, what helped me was to list everything the equation gives you, and if you have at least three of them you are good to go.

displacement (x_f - x_i)
start velocity (v_i)
end velocity (v_f)
change in time (t)
acceleration (a)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top