Acceleration due to Gravity on Mars

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration due to gravity on Mars based on telemetry data from a Martian probe's landing. The probe was launched at 25.0 m/s at a 20-degree angle, landing 110 meters away. Initial calculations for time and maximum height were presented, leading to an acceleration estimate of 1.827 m/s². However, a correction was noted regarding the time used in the height calculation, emphasizing the importance of halving the time to account for the peak height. The conversation highlights the necessity of understanding projectile motion formulas for accurate results.
mlee16
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Question: In 2004 two Martian probes successfully landed on the Red Planet. The final phase of the landing involved bouncing the probes until they came to rest (they were surrounded by protective inflated "balloons"). During one of the bounces, the telemetry (electronic data sent back to Earth) indicated that the probe took off at 25.0 m/s at an angle of 20 degrees and landed 110 m away (and then bounced again). Assuming the landing region was level, determine the acceleration due to gravity near the Martian surface.

Homework Equations


delta x = .5 * (velocity final + velocity initial) * time
Y final = y initial + .5 (velocity final + velocity initial) * time
Y final = y initial + (velocity initial) * time - .5 (acceleration) (time)^2

The Attempt at a Solution



delta x = .5 * (velocity final + velocity initial) * time
110 m = .5 * (25 cos 20 deg + 25 cos 20 deg) * time
Time = 4.68 s

I then found the height at the maximum point
Y final = y initial + .5 (velocity final + velocity initial) * time
Y final = 0 m + .5 (0 m/s + 25 sin 20 deg) * 4.68 sec
Y final = 20 m

I then used this equation to find acceleration
Y final = y initial + (velocity initial) * time - .5 (acceleration) (time)^2
20 = 0 m + (25 sin 20)(4.68) - .5(acceleration)(4.68)^2
Acceleration = 1.827 m/sec^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solution looks good. Doesn't it match with the answer?
 
No haha I actually just figured it out. I should have halved my time when using the second equation because you're calculating the peak height.
 
The equatins you used are not generally used. But they are correct. I would suggest you remember the formulaes of projectile motion. You can derive it if you want. There are general formulaes for maximum height, range and time of flight!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top