Acceleration in circular motion

AI Thread Summary
In circular motion, the total acceleration of an object can be calculated using the formula a = √(a²_c + a²_t), where a_c is the centripetal acceleration and a_t is the tangential acceleration. The centripetal acceleration, a_c, changes the direction of the velocity vector without altering its speed, while the tangential acceleration, a_t, affects the speed of the object without changing its direction. Since these two components are perpendicular to each other, the Pythagorean Theorem is applicable for determining the total acceleration's magnitude. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping how objects move in circular paths. The total acceleration vector thus represents the combined effects of both the direction and speed changes.
oneplusone
Messages
127
Reaction score
2
Hello,
Regarding acceleration in circular motion, my textbook says the total acceleration
of an object traveling in a circular path, can be computed by:

a = \sqrt{a^2_c + a^2_t}

and can be proved by pythag. thm.
Can someone help me understand this intuitively?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At each instant, the Acceleration Vector is nonzero when the Velocity Vector changes.

The component of the acceleration that is perpendicular to the Velocity Vector, a_c, is associated with changing the direction of the Velocity Vector (turning the velocity vector without changing its magnitude).

The component of the acceleration that is parallel to the Velocity Vector, a_t, is associated with changing the magnitude of the Velocity Vector (speeding up or slowing down, without changing its direction).

The total acceleration vector is the vector sum of these two components.
Since they are perpendicular to each other, you use the Pythagorean Theorem to compute the magnitude of the Acceleration Vector.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top