Acceleration of Body in Elevator & Earth with 0.5g Rise

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration of a body on a slope inside an elevator that accelerates upward at 0.5g. It clarifies that fictitious forces should be considered when analyzing the situation from the elevator's frame of reference, while only real forces apply when viewed from the Earth's inertial frame. The effective gravitational force inside the elevator is increased to 1.5g due to the upward acceleration, affecting how the body behaves on the slope. The conversation also touches on the importance of friction in determining the body's motion relative to the accelerating frame. Overall, understanding the distinction between frames of reference is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
Eitan Levy
Messages
259
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


A slope is inside an elevator. A body with the mass of m is on the slope. θ=30°.
What would be the acceleration of the body in relative to the elevator if the elevator rises with an acceleration of 0.5g?
What would be the acceleration of the body in relative to the Earth if the elevator rises with an acceleration of 0.5g?

Homework Equations


ma=F

The Attempt at a Solution


This question got me really confused. When am I supposed to add the fictitious force? When looking at the body in relative to the elevator or in relative to the earth?
The calculation itself is simple, but I can't figure in what case do I need to add the fictitious force. Thanks a lot.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20180612-133600.jpg
    Screenshot_20180612-133600.jpg
    10.6 KB · Views: 441
Physics news on Phys.org
Eitan Levy said:
When am I supposed to add the fictitious force?
Fictitious forces are used when viewing things from an accelerated frame. So use it in the frame of the elevator.
 
Doc Al said:
Fictitious forces are used when viewing things from an accelerated frame. So use it in the frame of the elevator.
And when looking at the elevator in relative to the EARTH. I shouldn't add this?
 
Eitan Levy said:
And when looking at the elevator in relative to the EARTH. I shouldn't add this?
Correct. For the purposes of the question, the Earth frame is near enough inertial.
 
Eitan Levy said:
And when looking at the elevator in relative to the EARTH. I shouldn't add this?
Right. In the inertial frame of the Earth (close enough, as haruspex says), only "real" forces appear: the normal force and gravity.

You could solve the problem in both frames, but you may find it easier to solve it in one frame then simply transform your answer to the other frame.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
haruspex said:
Correct. For the purposes of the question, the Earth frame is near enough inertial.

Doc Al said:
Right. In the inertial frame of the Earth (close enough, as haruspex says), only "real" forces appear: the normal force and gravity.

You could solve the problem in both frames, but you may find it easier to solve it in one frame then simply transform your answer to the other frame.

I if have a body on an accelerating wagon (the body doesn't move in relative to the wagon), with acceleration equals to a (horizontal).
If I look at it in relative to the Earth without adding such force, how does it make sense. I get just the normal and gravity, but the body does move with that acceleration, without having any forces acting that way.
 
Eitan Levy said:
I get just the normal and gravity,
If it is staying with the accelerating wagon then the wagon is exerting a horizontal force on it.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
Eitan Levy said:
I get just the normal and gravity, but the body does move with that acceleration, without having any forces acting that way.
For the body to accelerate there must be a force. For example, friction. (If the wagon surface were frictionless, the body could not accelerate.)
 
Doc Al said:
For the body to accelerate there must be a force. For example, friction. (If the wagon surface were frictionless, the body could not accelerate.)
It was never stated (that I see) if the situation in the elevator had any friction associated with the ramp. Is the wagon just another idea to try to figure it out?
 
  • #10
scottdave said:
It was never stated (that I see) if the situation in the elevator had any friction associated with the ramp. Is the wagon just another idea to try to figure it out?
It was another scenario introduced by Eitan in post #6.
 
  • #11
scottdave said:
It was never stated (that I see) if the situation in the elevator had any friction associated with the ramp.
The ramp, presumably, is frictionless.

scottdave said:
Is the wagon just another idea to try to figure it out?
A different scenario.
 
  • #12
Eitan Levy said:

Homework Statement


A slope is inside an elevator. A body with the mass of m is on the slope. θ=30°.
What would be the acceleration of the body in relative to the elevator if the elevator rises with an acceleration of 0.5g?
What would be the acceleration of the body in relative to the Earth if the elevator rises with an acceleration of 0.5g?

Homework Equations


ma=F

The Attempt at a Solution


This question got me really confused. When am I supposed to add the fictitious force? When looking at the body in relative to the elevator or in relative to the earth?
The calculation itself is simple, but I can't figure in what case do I need to add the fictitious force. Thanks a lot.

Inside the elevator, the "effective" gravitational force that is felt by the passengers (and any masses involved in an experiment) is just ##g_{\text{eff.}} = g+ 0.5 \times
g = 1.5\, g.## So you weigh more inside the elevator than you do standing on the ground, and dropped objects fall to the elevator floor faster as well.

Of course, if you filmed that from outside, through the transparent glass walls of an elevator, you would see a dropped object just traveling as usual using the standard Earth's acceleration of gravity, ##g##, but you would also see the elevator floor rising up to meet the object. From inside the elevator it looks like the object is falling faster.

I realize that your problem does not involve a dropped object, but the same downward forces are acting on the object as would be the case if the object were dropped. The ramp is opposing those forces and re-directing the direction of acceleration.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Eitan Levy
  • #13
Ray Vickson said:
Inside the elevator, the "effective" gravitational force that is felt by the passengers (and any masses involved in an experiment) is just ##g_{\text{eff.}} = g+ 0.5 \times
g = 1.5\, g.## So you weigh more inside the elevator than you do standing on the ground, and dropped objects fall to the elevator floor faster as well.

Of course, if you filmed that from outside, through the transparent glass walls of an elevator, you would see a dropped object just traveling as usual using the standard Earth's acceleration of gravity, ##g##, but you would also see the elevator floor rising up to meet the object. From inside the elevator it looks like the object is falling faster.

I realize that your problem does not involve a dropped object, but the same downward forces are acting on the object as would be the case if the object were dropped. The ramp is opposing those forces and re-directing the direction of acceleration.
That was really helpful! Thanks.
 
Back
Top