Accelertion Due to gravity on a ramp equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter krsbuilt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Ramp
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct equation for calculating acceleration due to gravity on a ramp, emphasizing that the gravitational force parallel to the incline is given by F_{//}=mgsin(θ). The original equation presented, which attempts to establish a linear relationship between angle and acceleration, is deemed incorrect due to the nonlinear nature of the sine function. It is clarified that acceleration can be derived from the force divided by mass, leading to the conclusion that acceleration on an incline is a function of the sine of the angle. The participant also notes that using a ball instead of a cart may have affected their experimental results. Ultimately, the accurate equation for acceleration along the ramp is confirmed to be G*sin(θ)=Ag.
krsbuilt
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm new to this forum so please don't mind my being a newbie. I found this equation at school, .5((90-theta)/90)*G=Ag where theta is the angle on the base (not the right angle)


|\
| \ <ramp
|_ \<Theta
^
right angle

and G is the acceleration due and Ag is acceleration in the direction of the ramp. i found this bu knowing if it's a 90 (horizontal/flat) degree angle then there is no acceleration and if it's 0 (vertical) degrees then there's full acceleration. so every degree in between 0 and 90 it adds (1/2)1/90*G to the acceleration to the acceleration in the direction of the ramp.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation is incorrect.

While it may seem tempting at times to contrive some relationship between two data points an extrapolate a linear relationship (what you've done), this type of analysis is often incorrect (and difficult to prove).

The correct equation results from the fact that the gravitational force parallel to the incline is given by:
F_{//}=mgsin(\theta)

So acceleration is given by:
a_{//}=gsin(\theta)
 
you have to break it up into two components. Thats the idea and that's what makes it a triangle and for triangles we have trigonometry. So how much "down" are you going if you are going that much "side"? well Fg=mg but that's only if you drop something directly down to the ground so if its on an angle and its the angle of the slope to the gound then you need to do (mg)sin(theta). So this gives you the force, now you have to find the acceleration and f=ma so f/m=a so just divide your previous answer by m and you are left with a. Hey what do you know? Newton's observations were correct, mass is canceled and irrelevant because the object accelerates at a certain rate despite it's mass. woohoo! i took a few extra steps to show you how the idea works :P. Oh by the way, a sin function is nonlinear therefore your linear equation i.e. (1/2)1/90*G simply can't be right. i mean i could be missing something but the only time lines and curvy lines are related and interchangeable is in calculus and this is high school physics so unless your prof or someone used calculus to get this relationship i just don't think it makes sense. The rate of change changes depending on theta so you can't treat it as if it doesn't and expect to be right.
 
i decided to change the equation to theta/90*g=Ag... My physics teacher told me that it was sheer luck that my data came close to the same. i was using a ball down a ramp and apparently the ball rolling can cause changes in the accelaration. so I'm going to change the ball to a cart and see what went wrong so i can figure out that the equation is actually G*sin(theta)=Ag.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top