Acceptance Angle in Optical fibre

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the acceptance angle in optical fibers and the conditions for Total Internal Reflection (TIR). It highlights the formula for TIR, which states that the angle of incidence must be greater than the critical angle for TIR to occur. There is a debate about whether the critical angle should be included in the conditions for TIR, with some arguing it represents a boundary rather than a state. The conversation also touches on the distinction between mathematical definitions and practical engineering applications. Ultimately, clarity on the role of the critical angle is essential for understanding light propagation in optical fibers.
ananth271194
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
According to the derivation of acceptance angle the first step is,
The condition for Total Internal reflection(TIR) is sin(i)≥n2/n1,
where i is angle of incidence in the core,
n2= refractive index of the cladding and n1=refractive index of the core.
sin(i(c))=n2/n1, where i(c) is the critical angle.
For TIR to take place the angle HAS TO BE ONLY GREATER than critical angle.
But the condition above contradicts the statement.
which one is true>
 
Science news on Phys.org
That's a very good point.

IMHO the critical angle is a boundary between two states and should not be included in either state.
Kind of like cutting a piece of paper along a line. Neither piece is part of the cut line.

The contradiction is present even in the text describing the formula and the formula itself here:
light entering the fiber will be guided if it falls within the acceptance cone of the fiber, that is if it makes an angle with the fiber axis that is less than the acceptance angle,

Wikipedia link
 
Last edited:
So basically you assume here that TIR is greater than or equal to critical angle?
 
I think you're letting 'pure maths' get in the way of common sense Engineering here. Engineering doesn't tend to distinguish between what, I seem to remember, are referred to as 'closed intervals' and 'open intervals'.
 
ananth271194 said:
So basically you assume here that TIR is greater than or equal to critical angle?

No,I would state that TIR occurs at angles greater than the critical angle.
For beams incident at critical angle, since no beam can be perfectly parallel, the portion at greater than critical angle is totally reflected. The portion at less than the critical angle is partially refracted. The critical angle is the 0 width boundary between the 2 portions.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top