Accoustics Problem 1 - Resonance and Speed of Sound

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werg22
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A tuning fork at 256 Hz creates a stationary wave in a partially submerged open-end tube by compressing air, with water reflecting the air to maintain the wave. Elevating the tube alters sound intensity due to changes in resonance, as resonance occurs at specific lengths related to the tube's configuration. The tube acts as a closed pipe resonator, and the speed of sound can be calculated using the formula for resonance in closed pipes. To determine resonance positions, one must consider the harmonic frequencies associated with the tube's length. Understanding the relationship between tube elevation and sound intensity is crucial for grasping resonance concepts.
Werg22
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
1
1. A tuning fork (frequency is 256 Hz) is placed above an open end tube that is partially in water.

a. Explain how a stationnary wave is created.

b. The tube is elevated a little. Explain why the sound intensity changes in therms of resonance.

c. The tube is elevate progressively from a postion of maximum intensity to the next position with the same property. If the tube is now 65 cm above water, what is the speed of sound in it?

My anwsers:

a: The fork compresses the air in the tube and the water reflects this aire, thus creating a continuous stationnary wave.

b: Need help... what is the link between power and the length of a open-close end tupe?

c: Same with this one...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what kind of resonator is this? open or closed pipe resonator? What is the formula to find where resonance will occur in the (open or closed pipe resonator, depending on which one it is) that will do for c. Now b, you do not really need to relate power with resonance. It seems to me that they just want to know what resonace means.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top