Accuracy of the exploding asteroids in The Empire Strikes Back movie

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the scientific accuracy of the asteroid explosion depicted in The Empire Strikes Back, specifically questioning whether a 40-meter nickel-iron asteroid could vaporize and disperse in less than a third of a second. Participants note that explosions in space differ significantly from those in an atmosphere, lacking the typical fireball and mushroom cloud. One contributor emphasizes that the portrayal of such explosions is fictional and should not be scrutinized for scientific accuracy. The conversation also touches on the nature of space explosions, comparing them to the lunar module's ascent, which shows particles dispersing in straight lines without air pressure. Ultimately, the thread highlights the tension between scientific realism and the fantastical elements of science fiction.

Is this explosion accurate?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • No

    Votes: 4 80.0%

  • Total voters
    5
marsh8472
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/2489/asteroidtiming.jpg

Here is a scene of a star destroyer firing on an asteroid. The entire explosion takes about 10 frames of video -- less than a third of a second. It's widely believed that the asteroid in question is about 40 meters in diameter and made of nickel-iron. It's also widely believed that this asteroid was vaporized. I'm curious about the scientific accuracy of the explosion. Do you think the asteroid was really vaporized? If so, would the vapor disperse in less than a third of a second like this? I've heard the opinion of one person who claims to be a physics expert and says the gas dispersion is accurate but I have serious doubts about that myself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
no one has any comment? :-o
 
First, it may take more than 76 minutes for someone to answer your question, especially as it is in the middle of the night in North America.

Second, it's fiction. There are no star destroyers, there is no Yoda, there is no Darth Vader and there is no force. Worrying about whether 0.33s of the movie is scientifically accurate misses the whole point.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
There are no star destroyers, there is no Yoda, there is no Darth Vader and there is no force.

Nooooooooooo! That's nonsense! I mean, it cannot be true, can it?

What's next, you going to tell me Santa Claus does not exist either?

* force chokes Vanadium *
 
you have to find out what that green stuff is first :D
 
In Star Trek, it would be a strongly ionized bundle of theta radiation emitted from the plasma chambers of the warp drive.

In Star Wars, it sort of looks like an inversely polarized antimatter beam.

(Do you think I could write an SF series?)
 
CompuChip said:
What's next, you going to tell me Santa Claus does not exist either?

Of course Santa Claus exists. I find your lack of faith...disturbing.
 
All seriousness aside, explosions in space are quite unlike explosions in an atmosphere. There's no fireball, and it doesn't mushroom the way that does.

If you've ever seen a pic of the lunar excursion module blasting off from the Moon's surface for its trip home you can see that it just looks like a bucnh of scintillating particles flying off in straight lines. There's no air back pressue to stop it.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top