Acid/Base Comparison: Understanding Conjugate Stability and Electronegativity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comparison
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of acid strengths, specifically focusing on the stability of conjugate bases and the role of electronegativity in determining acid strength. Participants explore various examples, including chlorous acid versus bromous acid and phosphoric acid versus phosphorous acid, examining the implications of resonance and structural differences.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the answer to the acid strength comparison cannot also be 4, suggesting that the size of Br allows for better charge distribution despite its lower electronegativity compared to Cl.
  • Another participant argues that chlorine's higher electronegativity means it holds onto its electrons more tightly, which could imply greater stability for the conjugate base of chlorous acid.
  • A participant expresses skepticism towards relying on general rules in chemistry, advocating for a more nuanced understanding that considers resonance structures rather than just electronegativity.
  • Further discussion highlights that while general rules may apply, they can be misleading, particularly in comparing acids with the same central atom but different structures, such as phosphoric and phosphorous acids.
  • One participant emphasizes that the stability of the conjugate base is crucial, noting that differences in resonance structures play a significant role in determining acid strength.
  • Another participant points out that the naming of phosphoric acids can be misleading, as phosphorous acid does not share a homologous relationship with phosphoric acid due to structural differences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and applicability of general rules in acid strength comparisons. While some acknowledge the usefulness of these rules, others argue for a more detailed analysis that considers additional factors like resonance and structural differences. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to compare acid strengths.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the comparison of acid strengths can be complicated by factors such as resonance stability and structural differences, which may not be adequately addressed by general rules. There is also mention of potential misconceptions arising from the naming conventions of acids.

Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://i.minus.com/jhPgz49XLoB3Z.png

Homework Equations



Strength of acid depends on conjugate stability.

The Attempt at a Solution



Why can't the answer also be 4? Both have the same number of oxygens attached, each of which exerts an inductive effect. The only difference is one has Cl and the other has Br. One would think that the conjugate base of bromous acid would be more stable because despite Br's slight lack of electronegativity versus Cl (2.8 vs. 3.0), Br is much bigger than Cl, and is therefore able to spread out negative charge over a bigger surface area.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try thinking of (4) a bit differently. Chlorine is more electronegative than Bromine (Electronegativity increases up and right on PT). This implies that Cl "loves" its electrons a bit more than Br, and wants to hold on to them. Because of this, the conjugate base of chlorous acid is a bit more stable as an ion than that of bromous acid.

A simpler way of looking at it is:
Both are oxyacids. The greater the electronegativity of the nonoxygen atom, the greater the acid strength. (General Chemistry rule)

http://www.ualr.edu/rebelford/chem1403/q1403/X5/17-9/17-9.htm
This also may help!
 
Thank you, but I have no use for rules in chemistry. Rules are simply a crutch; one must consider all aspects of the problems rather than relying on some "rule" that may or may not work. Speaking of oxoacids and your rule, consider phosphoric acid and phosphorous acid; both are oxoacids, and both have the same central atom (so both central atoms obviously have the same electronegativity). Yet the two differ in strength. This is due not to central atom EN differences but rather differences in the resonance structures of their conjugate bases.
 
Qube said:
Thank you, but I have no use for rules in chemistry.

Then you have to treat chemistry as a set fact of disjointed facts to memorize.

Rules are simply a crutch; one must consider all aspects of the problems rather than relying on some "rule" that may or may not work.

Agreed, but see above.

TBH, I don't like most of these rules, but in most cases even limping with a crutch is better then just lying in the middle of nowhere. And your guesses from the first post are not better than these rules are.

Speaking of oxoacids and your rule, consider phosphoric acid and phosphorous acid; both are oxoacids, and both have the same central atom (so both central atoms obviously have the same electronegativity). Yet the two differ in strength. This is due not to central atom EN differences but rather differences in the resonance structures of their conjugate bases.

The general rule is: when comparing two homologous acids the one with the higher electronegativity of the central atom is stronger, the one with the higher number of oxygen atoms (ie, higher oxidation number of the central atoms) is stronger.

Hence, first part of the rule tells us HOCl is stronger than HOBr, second part tells us phosphoric acid is stronger than phosphorous acid, disclaimer at the beginning tells us to get lost and not even try to use the rule to compare HOCl with H3PO4.
 
This rule is for homolous acids.

When comparing phosphorous acid and phosphoric acid, again you must compare the stability of its conjugate base. The differences in determining relative stabilities is no longer comparing the electronegativities between nonoxygen atoms (not simply because the nonoxygen atoms are the same) but more because there are a different number of oxygen atoms. Again, the "general rule" is that the greater the resonance, the greater the stability of the ion or molecule.

Now, if we want to get into the stability of resonance due to hybrid orbitals, then that is another topic. But to keep ideas simple and on topic, we can use certain rules that the describe behavior of molecular bonding due to ideas that can be complex - such as resonance. Since phosphoric acid has "more resonance" through is P-O bonds, its conjugate base is more stable. Thus, phosphoric acid being a stronger acid when compared to phosphorous acid.
 
Christian0412 said:
When comparing phosphorous acid and phosphoric acid, again you must compare the stability of its conjugate base. The differences in determining relative stabilities is no longer comparing the electronegativities between nonoxygen atoms (not simply because the nonoxygen atoms are the same) but more because there are a different number of oxygen atoms. Again, the "general rule" is that the greater the resonance, the greater the stability of the ion or molecule.

Now, if we want to get into the stability of resonance due to hybrid orbitals, then that is another topic. But to keep ideas simple and on topic, we can use certain rules that the describe behavior of molecular bonding due to ideas that can be complex - such as resonance. Since phosphoric acid has "more resonance" through is P-O bonds, its conjugate base is more stable. Thus, phosphoric acid being a stronger acid when compared to phosphorous acid.

Well, the data show that phosphorous acid is stronger than phosphoric acid, so we must revisit and revise our premise here.
 
Sigh, naming of the phosphoric acids is misleading.

Phosphorous acid is not homologous to phosphoric acid, check their structures.
 
Right, in phosphorous acid, we have a hydrogen stuck not to an oxygen but to the central phosphorous atom.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
19K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K